BenchRank
#30 in Automation & WorkflowUpdated 2026-08

Ui.Vision RPA

by UI.Vision RPA · Open-source RPA browser extension with OCR and Claude Computer Use

BenchRank score

44.5 — BenchRank score out of 100

Screenshots of Ui.Vision RPA

Homepage · Ui.Vision RPA

Homepage of Ui.Vision RPA

Overview

Ui.Vision RPA is an open-source browser extension for Chrome, Edge and Firefox that automates browser and desktop workflows on Windows, macOS and Linux. It combines Selenium-style commands with computer vision and OCR, visual record and replay, CSV-driven testing and a built-in Anthropic Claude Computer Use integration. Everything runs locally on the user's machine.

Best for
Teams automating browser and desktop tasks locally, where data must stay on the machine.
Pricing
Free and open-source for personal and commercial use; PRO is US$299/year and Enterprise starts at US$999/year for up to 5 users, with volume bundles up to US$4,999 for 50 users.
Runs on
Browser extensionCLI

Strengths and trade-offs

Strengths

  • Open-source and free for personal and commercial use
  • Runs locally; the site states data never leaves your machine
  • Web and desktop automation unlimited on every edition
  • Selenium IDE import/export plus a command line API

Trade-offs

  • Controlling extension updates requires Enterprise, from US$999/year
  • Free edition support is forum-only; email support starts at US$299/year
  • Enterprise Player licence disables macro creation — replay only
  • Licences are billed yearly; no monthly option is published

How Ui.Vision RPA markets itself

A structured read of the promise, proof and page design on Ui.Vision RPA’s captured homepage.

Homepage capture

“Open-Source Free RPA”

  • Angle: Open source / ownership
  • Hero: Product video demo

Pricing

Published plans and prices from Ui.Vision RPA’s own pricing page.

How this score is made up

Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.

  • MCP support

    Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.

  • API quality

    Public API surface: machine-readable spec, official SDKs, documented auth, errors, rate limits and versioning.

  • Documentation

    Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.

  • Agent friendliness

    How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.

  • Pricing transparency

    Whether real prices are published, self-serve signup exists, and usage costs are knowable without a sales call.

  • Changelog

    A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.

  • Marketing site structure

    Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.

  • Page speed

    How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.

  • Operational trust

    Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.

Measured, but not part of the score

Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.

  • Openness

    Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.

  • Maintenance

    Release cadence and repository activity. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — it is only measurable for open repositories.

This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Ui.Vision RPA’s score

Where this comes from

The Ui.Vision RPA pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.

Alternatives in Automation & Workflow

  • Ranked 1

    84.1 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Skyvern

    Skyvern · AI browser automation for portal logins, form filling and data extraction

    Best for: Teams automating logins, form fills and data pulls on web portals that expose no API

  • Ranked 2

    83.7 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Nango

    Nango · Code-first integration platform covering 900+ APIs

    Best for: Product teams building many third-party API integrations into a SaaS product or AI agent

  • Ranked 3

    82.4 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Windmill

    Windmill · Code-first orchestration platform for internal software

    Best for: Engineering teams building internal apps, workflows and data pipelines in code they self-host

See all 43 alternatives to Ui.Vision RPA

Is this your product?

Claim UI.Vision RPA to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.

Claim this business

Report a problem with this page

Report an issue with Ui.Vision RPA