Automatisch
by Automatisch · Open-source workflow automation you can self-host
BenchRank score
Screenshots of Automatisch
Homepage
Overview
Automatisch is an open-source workflow automation tool presented as a Zapier alternative, used to automate business processes without coding. It connects widely used online services into workflows, and can be run either on the vendor's cloud or self-hosted on your own servers so data stays in-house. Development is open to community contributions via GitHub and Discord.
- Best for
- Teams wanting no-code workflow automation they can self-host to keep data on their own servers
- Pricing
- No prices are shown; the page only refers to an 'affordable cloud solution' alongside self-hosting.
- Runs on
- Self-hosted
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- Open source; can be self-hosted on your own servers
- Data can stay in-house, aimed at GDPR-bound organisations
- Hosted cloud option for those not wanting to self-host
- Connects to widely used online services via integrations
Trade-offs
- No prices published on the captured page
- Self-hosting means you run and maintain the servers yourself
- Integration coverage is not listed, only linked
- Site names just two team members, so it is a small project
Pricing
Published plans and prices from Automatisch’s own pricing page.
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
MCP support
Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.
API quality
Public API surface: machine-readable spec, official SDKs, documented auth, errors, rate limits and versioning.
Documentation
Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.
Agent friendliness
How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.
Changelog
A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.
Marketing site structure
Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.
Page speed
How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.
Operational trust
Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
Openness
Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.
Maintenance
Release cadence and repository activity. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — it is only measurable for open repositories.
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Automatisch’s score
Where this comes from
The Automatisch pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.
Alternatives in Automation & Workflow
Ranked 1
84.1 — BenchRank score out of 100Skyvern
Skyvern · AI browser automation for portal logins, form filling and data extraction
Best for: Teams automating logins, form fills and data pulls on web portals that expose no API
Ranked 2
83.7 — BenchRank score out of 100Nango
Nango · Code-first integration platform covering 900+ APIs
Best for: Product teams building many third-party API integrations into a SaaS product or AI agent
Ranked 3
82.4 — BenchRank score out of 100Windmill
Windmill · Code-first orchestration platform for internal software
Best for: Engineering teams building internal apps, workflows and data pipelines in code they self-host
Is this your product?
Claim Automatisch to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.