BenchRank
#37 in Application SecurityUpdated

VirusTotal

by VirusTotal · VirusTotal

BenchRank score

34.5 — BenchRank score out of 100

Screenshots of VirusTotal

Homepage · VirusTotal

Homepage of VirusTotal

Overview

VirusTotal

Best for
Pricing

Strengths and trade-offs

Strengths

    Trade-offs

      How VirusTotal markets itself

      A structured read of the promise, proof and page design on VirusTotal’s captured homepage.

      Homepage capture

      “VIRUSTOTAL”

      • Angle: Security / trust-led
      • Hero: Interactive demo

      Pricing

      Published plans and prices from VirusTotal’s own pricing page.

      How this score is made up

      Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.

      • MCP support

        Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.

      • API quality

        Public API surface: machine-readable spec, official SDKs, documented auth, errors, rate limits and versioning.

      • Documentation

        Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.

      • Agent friendliness

        How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.

      • Customer sentiment

        Third-party ratings, shrunk toward the catalogue mean by review volume and corroborated across independent sources.

      • Changelog

        A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.

      • Marketing site structure

        Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.

      • Page speed

        How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.

      • Operational trust

        Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.

      Measured, but not part of the score

      Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.

      • Openness

        Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.

      • Maintenance

        Release cadence and repository activity. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — it is only measurable for open repositories.

      This doesn’t look right — report a problem with VirusTotal’s score

      Where this comes from

      The VirusTotal pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.

      Alternatives in Application Security

      • Ranked 1

        83.1 — BenchRank score out of 100

        Sentry

        Sentry · Error tracking and application performance monitoring for developers

        Best for: Development teams wanting error monitoring, tracing and session replay tied to one trace

      • Ranked 2

        80.8 — BenchRank score out of 100

        GrowthBook

        GrowthBook · Warehouse-native feature flags, experimentation and product analytics

        Best for: Product and engineering teams running feature flags and experiments on their own data warehouse.

      • Ranked 3

        79.4 — BenchRank score out of 100

        Temps

        Temps · Self-hosted deploy platform with built-in analytics, errors and monitoring

        Best for: Teams self-hosting deployments who also want analytics, error tracking and uptime on their own server

      See all 53 alternatives to VirusTotal

      Is this your product?

      Claim VirusTotal to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.

      Claim this business

      Report a problem with this page

      Report an issue with VirusTotal