Temps
by Temps · Self-hosted deploy platform with built-in analytics, errors and monitoring
BenchRank score
Screenshots of Temps
Homepage
Overview
Temps is a self-hosted deployment platform distributed as a single Rust binary. It runs git-push builds with preview URLs and automatic SSL, provisions PostgreSQL, MariaDB, MongoDB, Redis and RustFS object storage, and includes visitor analytics, session replay, Sentry-compatible error tracking, OpenTelemetry tracing and uptime monitoring. Underneath it uses plain Docker containers and Postgres.
- Best for
- Teams self-hosting deployments who also want analytics, error tracking and uptime on their own server
- Pricing
- Community is free to self-host under Apache 2.0, Premium is $399/month flat for unlimited users, Enterprise starts at $4,000/month on an annual contract, and Custom starts at $100,000/year.
- Runs on
- macOSSelf-hostedCLI
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- Deploy, errors, tracing, analytics and uptime in one binary
- Free Apache 2.0 edition, unlimited projects and users
- No per-seat, per-event or bandwidth charges on any tier
- Imports apps, databases and domains from Coolify, Vercel, Docker
Trade-offs
- Self-hosted only — you supply and maintain the server
- Paid tier jumps straight from free to $399/month flat
- SSO, SCIM and audit streaming are listed as roadmap, not shipped
- macOS is for local dev only; running it needs Linux or a Docker host
How Temps markets itself
A structured read of the promise, proof and page design on Temps’s captured homepage.
Homepage capture
“Stop paying for 7 SaaS tools.”
- Angle: All-in-one / consolidation
- Hero: Product screenshot
Pricing
Published plans and prices from Temps’s own pricing page.
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
MCP support
Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.
API quality
Public API surface: machine-readable spec, official SDKs, documented auth, errors, rate limits and versioning.
Documentation
Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.
Agent friendliness
How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.
Pricing transparency
Whether real prices are published, self-serve signup exists, and usage costs are knowable without a sales call.
Changelog
A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.
Marketing site structure
Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.
Page speed
How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.
Operational trust
Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
Openness
Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.
Maintenance
Release cadence and repository activity. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — it is only measurable for open repositories.
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Temps’s score
Where this comes from
The Temps pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.
Alternatives in Build & Deployment
Ranked 1
82.4 — BenchRank score out of 100Windmill
Windmill · Code-first orchestration platform for internal software
Best for: Engineering teams building internal apps, workflows and data pipelines in code they self-host
Ranked 2
81.9 — BenchRank score out of 100Encore
Encore · Declare backend infrastructure in Go or TypeScript, deploy to your own cloud
Best for: Teams building Go or TypeScript backends on their own AWS or GCP without a platform team
Ranked 3
80.5 — BenchRank score out of 100GitLab
GitLab · DevSecOps platform with AI agents across planning, code, CI/CD and security
Best for: Teams that want planning, source control, CI/CD and security scanning in one platform.
Is this your product?
Claim Temps to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.