tirreno
by Tirreno · Open-source event tracking, threat detection and risk scoring for any product
BenchRank score
Screenshots of tirreno
Homepage
Overview
tirreno is a self-hosted security framework that collects events from your application via SDKs or its API and scores risk against preset or custom rules. A built-in dashboard shows per-user activity timelines, connected identities, risk scores and field audit trails. A review queue suspends accounts with risky events or flags them for manual review at set thresholds.
- Best for
- Dev and product teams self-hosting fraud, abuse and account-threat monitoring inside their own app
- Pricing
- Community edition is free under AGPLv3, Internal edition is contact-sales, and Platform edition starts at €3 985/month; implementation service packs cost €3 050–€9 850.
- Runs on
- Self-hosted
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- Free AGPLv3 edition, self-hosted with unlimited events and retention
- Docker compose one-liner setup; no stack or DNS changes
- On-premises and air-gapped deployment offered on every tier
- No-code rule engine, review queue and trust scoring in the free tier
Trade-offs
- API access and SIEM event feeds only on Platform, from €3 985/mo
- Free tier has no web-hooks, SAML, multi-application or email support
- Needs server-side code running on every page for every logged-in user
- Setup and integration help sold separately, from €3 050
How tirreno markets itself
A structured read of the promise, proof and page design on tirreno’s captured homepage.
Homepage capture
“Security framework”
- Angle: Security / trust-led
- Hero: Product screenshot
Pricing
Published plans and prices from tirreno’s own pricing page.
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
MCP support
Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.
API quality
Public API surface: machine-readable spec, official SDKs, documented auth, errors, rate limits and versioning.
Documentation
Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.
Agent friendliness
How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.
Pricing transparency
Whether real prices are published, self-serve signup exists, and usage costs are knowable without a sales call.
Changelog
A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.
Marketing site structure
Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.
Page speed
How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.
Operational trust
Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
Openness
Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.
Maintenance
Release cadence and repository activity. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — it is only measurable for open repositories.
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with tirreno’s score
Where this comes from
The tirreno pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.
Alternatives in Application Security
Ranked 1
83.1 — BenchRank score out of 100Sentry
Sentry · Error tracking and application performance monitoring for developers
Best for: Development teams wanting error monitoring, tracing and session replay tied to one trace
Ranked 2
80.8 — BenchRank score out of 100GrowthBook
GrowthBook · Warehouse-native feature flags, experimentation and product analytics
Best for: Product and engineering teams running feature flags and experiments on their own data warehouse.
Ranked 3
79.4 — BenchRank score out of 100Temps
Temps · Self-hosted deploy platform with built-in analytics, errors and monitoring
Best for: Teams self-hosting deployments who also want analytics, error tracking and uptime on their own server
Is this your product?
Claim Tirreno to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.