BenchRank
#26 in Storage & CDNUpdated 2026-08

Storj

by Storj · S3-compatible object storage on a distributed network

BenchRank score

40.6 — BenchRank score out of 100

Screenshots of Storj

Homepage · Storj

Homepage of Storj

Overview

Storj is S3-compatible object storage that spreads data across a distributed network of storage locations rather than a single region, using erasure coding for durability. A separate product, Object Mount, presents object storage as a local drive. Plans cover either globally distributed storage or U.S. SOC 2 Type 2 data centres.

Best for
Teams needing S3-compatible object storage for globally distributed media and AI workflows.
Pricing
Free 30-day trial, then contact sales: Standard at $7/TB storage and $7/TB egress, Advanced at $10/TB plus $7/TB egress, with a $5 minimum monthly fee.
Runs on
Web

Strengths and trade-offs

Strengths

  • S3-compatible; described as a drop-in replacement for AWS S3
  • $7/TB storage and $7/TB egress, with no API or segment fees
  • 11 nines durability via erasure coding across the network
  • Object Mount client presents object storage as a local drive

Trade-offs

  • Both paid plans are contact-sales only, with no self-serve sign-up shown
  • $5 minimum monthly invoice applies even when usage is lower
  • Standard bills any object under 50 KB as 50 KB
  • Standard charges an early deletion fee below 30 days of retention

How Storj markets itself

A structured read of the promise, proof and page design on Storj’s captured homepage.

Homepage capture

“Work instantly from the global cloud.”

  • Angle: Speed / time-to-value
  • Hero: Product screenshot

Pricing

Published plans and prices from Storj’s own pricing page.

How this score is made up

Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.

  • MCP support

    Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.

  • Documentation

    Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.

  • Agent friendliness

    How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.

  • Pricing transparency

    Whether real prices are published, self-serve signup exists, and usage costs are knowable without a sales call.

  • Changelog

    A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.

  • Marketing site structure

    Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.

  • Page speed

    How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.

  • Operational trust

    Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.

Measured, but not part of the score

Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.

  • Openness

    Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.

  • Maintenance

    Release cadence and repository activity. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — it is only measurable for open repositories.

This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Storj’s score

Where this comes from

The Storj pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.

Alternatives in Storage & CDN

  • Ranked 1

    80.1 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Cloudflare

    Cloudflare · Global network for CDN, security, serverless compute and Zero Trust access

    Best for: Teams wanting CDN, DDoS protection, serverless compute and Zero Trust access on one network

  • Ranked 2

    65.4 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Dropbox

    Dropbox · Cloud storage, file sharing and team collaboration

    Best for: Teams needing shared cloud storage, large file transfers and admin control over synced folders

  • Ranked 3

    63.4 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Filestash

    Filestash · Self-hosted web file manager and gateway for existing storage

    Best for: Teams needing one web file manager and gateway in front of existing S3, SMB or SFTP storage

See all 42 alternatives to Storj

Is this your product?

Claim Storj to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.

Claim this business

Report a problem with this page

Report an issue with Storj