BenchRank
#25 in Identity & Access ManagementUpdated 2026-08

SoftEther VPN

by SoftEther VPN · Open-source multi-protocol VPN server built on virtual Ethernet switching

BenchRank score

31.7 — BenchRank score out of 100

Screenshots of SoftEther VPN

Homepage · SoftEther VPN

Homepage of SoftEther VPN

Overview

SoftEther VPN is open-source VPN software from an academic project at the University of Tsukuba. It virtualises Ethernet: the server runs Virtual Hubs (software switches), clients run virtual network adapters, and VPN sessions carry Ethernet frames over HTTPS or UDP. It supports remote-access and site-to-site setups over SSL-VPN, OpenVPN, IPsec, L2TP, L2TPv3, MS-SSTP and EtherIP.

Best for
Teams self-hosting a multi-protocol remote-access or site-to-site VPN across mixed platforms
Pricing
No prices are shown; the software is free for personal and commercial use under the Apache License 2.0.
Runs on
Self-hosted

Strengths and trade-offs

Strengths

  • Six major VPN protocols plus SSL-VPN in a single server
  • Free for personal and commercial use under Apache License 2.0
  • Servers run on Windows, Linux, Mac, FreeBSD and Solaris
  • Built-in NAT traversal and dynamic DNS; no fixed IP required

Trade-offs

  • Support is a community forum; no paid support plan is mentioned
  • Past CVEs, including six fixed in 2023 after a Cisco code review
  • Firewall-bypassing modes (VPN over DNS/ICMP) may breach network policy
  • Interface languages limited to English, Japanese and Simplified Chinese

How SoftEther VPN markets itself

A structured read of the promise, proof and page design on SoftEther VPN’s captured homepage.

Homepage capture

“SoftEther VPN Project”

  • Angle: Open source / ownership
  • Hero: Typography only

Pricing

Published plans and prices from SoftEther VPN’s own pricing page.

How this score is made up

Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.

  • MCP support

    Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.

  • API quality

    Public API surface: machine-readable spec, official SDKs, documented auth, errors, rate limits and versioning.

  • Documentation

    Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.

  • Agent friendliness

    How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.

  • Pricing transparency

    Whether real prices are published, self-serve signup exists, and usage costs are knowable without a sales call.

  • Customer sentiment

    Third-party ratings, shrunk toward the catalogue mean by review volume and corroborated across independent sources.

  • Changelog

    A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.

  • Marketing site structure

    Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.

  • Page speed

    How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.

  • Operational trust

    Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.

Measured, but not part of the score

Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.

  • Openness

    Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.

  • Maintenance

    Release cadence and repository activity. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — it is only measurable for open repositories.

This doesn’t look right — report a problem with SoftEther VPN’s score

Where this comes from

The SoftEther VPN pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.

Alternatives in Identity & Access Management

  • Ranked 1

    77 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Ory

    Ory · API-first identity and access management, self-hosted or managed

    Best for: Engineering teams wanting API-first identity and access management they can self-host or buy as SaaS

  • Ranked 2

    73.9 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Logto

    Logto · Open-source auth infrastructure with SSO, RBAC and multi-tenancy

    Best for: Developers adding auth, enterprise SSO and multi-tenancy to SaaS or AI apps without building it

  • Ranked 3

    70.9 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Hexclave

    Hexclave · Open-source auth, payments, email and analytics building blocks

    Best for: Startups wanting auth, payments, emails and analytics as one open-source, self-hostable platform.

See all 32 alternatives to SoftEther VPN

Is this your product?

Claim SoftEther VPN to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.

Claim this business

Report a problem with this page

Report an issue with SoftEther VPN