
HackerOne Code
by PullRequest · AI-filtered, human-validated security review in your pull requests
45.9 — BenchRank score out of 100
Screenshots of HackerOne Code
Homepage Pricing page
Overview
HackerOne Code, formerly PullRequest, reviews code changes for security problems inside the source control tools a team already uses. Its AI, Hai, flags high-risk changes and filters out low-risk ones, and contracted expert engineers manually validate each finding before it is surfaced to developers. It integrates with GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and Azure DevOps.
- Best for
- Development teams wanting expert human security review of pull requests inside their existing SCM.
- Pricing
- One published plan, TEAM at $129 per developer per month billed annually with a two-week trial; Enterprise is custom priced through sales.
- Runs on
- WebSelf-hosted
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- Findings validated by human reviewers before developers see them
- Integrates with GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and Azure DevOps
- All major languages and frameworks supported out of the box
- Enterprise option to keep code on your own network
Trade-offs
- Smart Review Selection covers only ~30-40% of pull requests
- Reviews run in US business hours; turnaround varies by size
- No free tier or self-serve sign-up; both plans go via sales
- SSO, API access and on-premise require the Enterprise plan
Pricing
Published plans from HackerOne Code’s own pricing page, in USD. Usage charges and add-ons may apply on top.
| Plan | Monthly | Annual (per month) | Includes |
|---|---|---|---|
| TEAM | —per developer | $129 |
|
| ENTERPRISE | Contact sales | — |
|
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
- MCP support
- 0 out of 100
- Documentation
- 60 out of 100
- Agent friendliness
- 85 out of 100
- Pricing transparency
- 80 out of 100
- Changelog
- 0 out of 100
- Marketing site structure
- 70 out of 100
- Operational trust
- 35 out of 100
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
- Openness
- 85 out of 100
- Maintenance
- 85 out of 100
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with HackerOne Code’s score
Alternatives in Code Review
Ranked 1
55 — BenchRank score out of 100Gogs
Gogs · Self-hosted Git service that runs from a single Go binary
Best for: Small teams or individuals self-hosting Git on modest hardware, including ARM boxes
Ranked 2
48.6 — BenchRank score out of 100Gitea
Gitea · Self-hosted Git, CI/CD and package hosting under the MIT licence
Best for: Teams that want to self-host Git, CI/CD and package registries on their own infrastructure.
Ranked 4
22.1 — BenchRank score out of 100Opengrep
Opengrep · Open-source static analysis engine forked from Semgrep CE
Best for: Security teams wanting an open-source SAST engine with no features locked behind a licence.

