Opengrep
by Opengrep · Open-source static analysis engine forked from Semgrep CE
BenchRank score
Screenshots of Opengrep
Homepage
Overview
Opengrep is a fork of Semgrep CE that provides an open-source static analysis engine for scanning source code (SAST). It runs as a CLI distributed on GitHub and produces JSON and SARIF output so results fit existing workflows. Development is funded by a consortium of application security companies and a full-time developer team.
- Best for
- Security teams wanting an open-source SAST engine with no features locked behind a licence.
- Pricing
- No prices are shown; the page states the project is free and open-source, obtained from its GitHub repository.
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- Fully open-source, with no login needed for scan metadata
- Backward compatible; supports JSON and SARIF output
- Built by a full-time team backed by an industry consortium
- PRs judged on merit, not one vendor's commercial interest
Trade-offs
- Cross-file, inter-procedural and Windows support are stated as roadmap
- Only a CLI is described; no hosted UI or dashboard is mentioned
- A recent fork of Semgrep CE, so it has little track record
- The site gives no docs, rule library or supported-language list
Pricing
Published plans and prices from Opengrep’s own pricing page.
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
MCP support
Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.
API quality
Public API surface: machine-readable spec, official SDKs, documented auth, errors, rate limits and versioning.
Documentation
Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.
Agent friendliness
How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.
Changelog
A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.
Marketing site structure
Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.
Page speed
How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.
Operational trust
Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
Openness
Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.
Maintenance
Release cadence and repository activity. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — it is only measurable for open repositories.
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Opengrep’s score
Where this comes from
The Opengrep pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.
Alternatives in Application Security
Ranked 1
83.1 — BenchRank score out of 100Sentry
Sentry · Error tracking and application performance monitoring for developers
Best for: Development teams wanting error monitoring, tracing and session replay tied to one trace
Ranked 2
80.8 — BenchRank score out of 100GrowthBook
GrowthBook · Warehouse-native feature flags, experimentation and product analytics
Best for: Product and engineering teams running feature flags and experiments on their own data warehouse.
Ranked 3
79.4 — BenchRank score out of 100Temps
Temps · Self-hosted deploy platform with built-in analytics, errors and monitoring
Best for: Teams self-hosting deployments who also want analytics, error tracking and uptime on their own server
Is this your product?
Claim Opengrep to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.