Patch My PC
by Patch My PC · Automated third-party patching for Intune, ConfigMgr and WSUS
BenchRank score
Screenshots of Patch My PC
Homepage
Overview
Patch My PC automates third-party application patching and deployment for Windows and macOS estates managed with Microsoft ConfigMgr, Intune and WSUS. It maintains a tested catalogue of 3,583 products, automates packaging and publishing of updates, and supports custom apps. The Premium tier adds CVE and threat analytics, device health inventory and real-time ConfigMgr actions.
- Best for
- IT teams patching third-party apps on Windows and macOS via Intune, ConfigMgr or WSUS.
- Pricing
- Per-device annual subscription: Enterprise Plus at $3.50/device/year starting at $3,500/year, and Enterprise Premium at $5/device/year starting at $5,000/year, each covering up to 1,000 devices at the starting price.
- Runs on
- Self-hosted
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- Curated, tested catalog of 3,583 supported products
- Works with ConfigMgr, Intune and WSUS, on-prem or cloud
- Packages Windows x86, x64 and ARM64 plus macOS apps
- Unlimited support and onboarding included in the price
Trade-offs
- Minimum $3,500/year applies even below 1,000 devices
- Only covers Windows and macOS through Microsoft management tools
- CVE visibility and advanced reporting need the $5/device Premium tier
- Custom apps capped at 100 (Plus) or 500 (Premium), with storage limits
How Patch My PC markets itself
A structured read of the promise, proof and page design on Patch My PC’s captured homepage.
Homepage capture
“Automate Third-Party Patch Management in Intune & Microsoft ConfigMgr”
- Angle: Autopilot / hands-off
- Hero: Product screenshot
Pricing
Published plans and prices from Patch My PC’s own pricing page.
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
MCP support
Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.
API quality
Public API surface: machine-readable spec, official SDKs, documented auth, errors, rate limits and versioning.
Documentation
Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.
Agent friendliness
How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.
Pricing transparency
Whether real prices are published, self-serve signup exists, and usage costs are knowable without a sales call.
Customer sentiment
Third-party ratings, shrunk toward the catalogue mean by review volume and corroborated across independent sources.
Changelog
A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.
Marketing site structure
Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.
Page speed
How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.
Operational trust
Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
Openness
Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Patch My PC’s score
Where this comes from
The Patch My PC pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.
Alternatives in Application Security
Ranked 1
83.1 — BenchRank score out of 100Sentry
Sentry · Error tracking and application performance monitoring for developers
Best for: Development teams wanting error monitoring, tracing and session replay tied to one trace
Ranked 2
80.8 — BenchRank score out of 100GrowthBook
GrowthBook · Warehouse-native feature flags, experimentation and product analytics
Best for: Product and engineering teams running feature flags and experiments on their own data warehouse.
Ranked 3
79.4 — BenchRank score out of 100Temps
Temps · Self-hosted deploy platform with built-in analytics, errors and monitoring
Best for: Teams self-hosting deployments who also want analytics, error tracking and uptime on their own server
Is this your product?
Claim Patch My PC to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.