BenchRank
#17 in Storage & CDNUpdated 2026-08

Koofr

by Koofr · European cloud storage with client-side encrypted Vault

BenchRank score

45.6 — BenchRank score out of 100

Screenshots of Koofr

Homepage · Koofr

Homepage of Koofr

Overview

Koofr is a European cloud storage service that stores encrypted files across EU-based data centres and states it does not track activity, scan files or keep hidden copies after deletion. It can connect existing Dropbox, OneDrive and Google Drive accounts so all files are searchable in one place, edit documents via Office for the web, and share through permissioned or expiring links. Koofr Vault adds client-side encrypted storage.

Best for
Individuals and small teams wanting EU-hosted cloud storage that doesn't track or scan files
Pricing
Free 10 GB forever, then storage plans from €0.50/month (10 GB) to €35/month (5 TB), billed yearly only with 22% VAT included.
Runs on
Web

Strengths and trade-offs

Strengths

  • Free 10 GB tier, plus 10 GB extra space on every paid plan
  • Connects Dropbox, OneDrive and Google Drive into one search
  • EU data centres, no tracking, no file scanning, GDPR by default
  • Apps for web, Windows, Mac, Linux, iOS, Android and Huawei

Trade-offs

  • Only yearly subscriptions are currently sold; no monthly billing
  • Local folders sync appears only from the 250 GB plan upwards
  • Free tier keeps deleted files 7 days and caps sharing links at 10
  • Daily public transfer capped: 50 GB on free, 200 GB to 4 TB on paid

How Koofr markets itself

A structured read of the promise, proof and page design on Koofr’s captured homepage.

Homepage capture

“One storage for all documents”

  • Angle: All-in-one / consolidation
  • Hero: Product screenshot

Pricing

Published plans and prices from Koofr’s own pricing page.

How this score is made up

Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.

  • MCP support

    Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.

  • Documentation

    Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.

  • Agent friendliness

    How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.

  • Pricing transparency

    Whether real prices are published, self-serve signup exists, and usage costs are knowable without a sales call.

  • Customer sentiment

    Third-party ratings, shrunk toward the catalogue mean by review volume and corroborated across independent sources.

  • Changelog

    A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.

  • Marketing site structure

    Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.

  • Page speed

    How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.

  • Operational trust

    Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.

Measured, but not part of the score

Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.

  • Openness

    Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.

  • Maintenance

    Release cadence and repository activity. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — it is only measurable for open repositories.

This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Koofr’s score

Where this comes from

The Koofr pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.

Alternatives in Storage & CDN

  • Ranked 1

    80.1 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Cloudflare

    Cloudflare · Global network for CDN, security, serverless compute and Zero Trust access

    Best for: Teams wanting CDN, DDoS protection, serverless compute and Zero Trust access on one network

  • Ranked 2

    65.4 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Dropbox

    Dropbox · Cloud storage, file sharing and team collaboration

    Best for: Teams needing shared cloud storage, large file transfers and admin control over synced folders

  • Ranked 3

    63.4 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Filestash

    Filestash · Self-hosted web file manager and gateway for existing storage

    Best for: Teams needing one web file manager and gateway in front of existing S3, SMB or SFTP storage

See all 42 alternatives to Koofr

Is this your product?

Claim Koofr to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.

Claim this business

Report a problem with this page

Report an issue with Koofr