
Hoodik
by Hoodik · Self-hosted, end-to-end encrypted cloud storage in one Docker container
BenchRank score
Screenshots of Hoodik
Homepage
Overview
Hoodik is a self-hosted cloud storage server written in Rust and Vue. Files are encrypted in the browser before upload, each with its own key protected by a post-quantum scheme, so the server only stores ciphertext. It runs as a single Docker container with SQLite or PostgreSQL metadata and can keep encrypted chunks on S3-compatible storage.
- Best for
- Privacy-conscious self-hosters who want cloud storage the server operator cannot read.
- Pricing
- The self-hosted server (CC BY-NC 4.0) and the iOS, Android and macOS apps are free; the managed Hoodik Cloud starts at €9/month.
- Runs on
- iOSAndroidSelf-hosted
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- Files encrypted in the browser; server holds only ciphertext
- Single Docker container, multi-arch, idles at around 20 MB RAM
- Encrypted chunks can go to any S3-compatible storage
- Native Rust apps for iOS, Android and macOS at no cost
Trade-offs
- Free server is CC BY-NC 4.0, so commercial use is restricted
- Self-hosting leaves you handling the server, updates and backups
- Public link sharing puts the decryption key in the URL fragment
- Sharing with people is limited to accounts on your own server
How Hoodik markets itself
A structured read of the promise, proof and page design on Hoodik’s captured homepage.
Homepage capture
“Your files. Your keys. Your server.”
- Angle: Open source / ownership
- Hero: Product screenshot
Pricing
Published plans and prices from Hoodik’s own pricing page.
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
MCP support
Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.
Documentation
Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.
Agent friendliness
How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.
Changelog
A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.
Marketing site structure
Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.
Page speed
How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.
Operational trust
Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
Openness
Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.
Maintenance
Release cadence and repository activity. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — it is only measurable for open repositories.
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Hoodik’s score
Where this comes from
The Hoodik pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.
Alternatives in Storage & CDN
Ranked 1
80.1 — BenchRank score out of 100Cloudflare
Cloudflare · Global network for CDN, security, serverless compute and Zero Trust access
Best for: Teams wanting CDN, DDoS protection, serverless compute and Zero Trust access on one network
Ranked 2
65.4 — BenchRank score out of 100Dropbox
Dropbox · Cloud storage, file sharing and team collaboration
Best for: Teams needing shared cloud storage, large file transfers and admin control over synced folders
Ranked 3
63.4 — BenchRank score out of 100Filestash
Filestash · Self-hosted web file manager and gateway for existing storage
Best for: Teams needing one web file manager and gateway in front of existing S3, SMB or SFTP storage
Is this your product?
Claim Hoodik to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.
