#47 in Application SecurityUpdated 2026-08

EdgeBit

by EdgeBit · Runtime-aware SCA, SBOMs and automated dependency upgrades

23.1 — BenchRank score out of 100

Homepage
Pricing page

Visit website See full Application Security ranking

Overview

EdgeBit runs continuous SCA and SBOM generation across build pipelines and production servers, mapping vulnerabilities to the code that is actually running so inactive dependencies are deprioritised. Its Dependency Autofix raises and merges dependency updates via a GitHub or GitLab bot. The company has been acquired by FOSSA.

Best for: Engineering and security teams wanting vulnerabilities ranked by runtime use and patched automatically.
Pricing: A free Developer plan is published; the Team plan is priced per developer per month and Enterprise is tailored, but no figures are shown.

Strengths and trade-offs

Strengths

Ranks vulnerabilities by whether the code actually runs
Raises and merges dependency updates, not just alerts
Free tier covers 3 workloads, 3 repos and one server
SSO via Google, Okta and OIDC on every plan

Trade-offs

No prices published for the Team or Enterprise plans
Runtime analysis is priced per server on top of per-developer fees
Acquired by FOSSA, so the standalone product's future is unclear
No self-serve signup shown; the main call to action is a demo

Pricing

Published plans from EdgeBit’s own pricing page, in USD. Usage charges and add-ons may apply on top.

EdgeBit pricing tiers, monthly rates in USD
Plan	Monthly	Includes
DEVELOPER	—	Unlimited manual security investigation Build pipeline for 3 workloads, runtime analysis for 1 server GitHub bot and Dependency Autofix for 3 repos Corporate SSO: Google, Okta, OIDC
TEAM	—per developer, per month	Build pipelines for unlimited workloads Unlimited Dependency Autofix Runtime analysis priced per server Repo bot for unlimited repos on GitHub, GitLab and more
ENTERPRISE	Contact sales	Plan tailored to your needs Unlimited build pipelines and Dependency Autofix Runtime analysis with custom pricing Repo bot for unlimited repos, corporate SSO

How this score is made up

Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.

MCP support: 0 out of 100
API quality: 0 out of 100
Documentation: 20 out of 100
Agent friendliness: 58 out of 100
Pricing transparency: 35 out of 100
Changelog: 0 out of 100
Marketing site structure: 50 out of 100
Operational trust: 70 out of 100

Measured, but not part of the score

Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.

Openness: 85 out of 100
Maintenance: 65 out of 100

This doesn’t look right — report a problem with EdgeBit’s score

Alternatives in Application Security

Ranked 1
81.6 — BenchRank score out of 100
Sentry
Sentry · Error tracking and application performance monitoring for developers
Best for: Development teams wanting error monitoring, tracing and session replay tied to one trace
Ranked 2
81.2 — BenchRank score out of 100
GrowthBook
GrowthBook · Warehouse-native feature flags, experimentation and product analytics
Best for: Product and engineering teams running feature flags and experiments on their own data warehouse.
Ranked 3
77.5 — BenchRank score out of 100
Temps
Temps · Self-hosted deploy platform with built-in analytics, errors and monitoring
Best for: Teams self-hosting deployments who also want analytics, error tracking and uptime on their own server