BenchRank
#11 in Storage & CDNUpdated 2026-08

Duplicati

by Duplicati · Encrypted backups to your own cloud or on-prem storage, centrally managed

BenchRank score

51.5 — BenchRank score out of 100

Screenshots of Duplicati

Homepage · Duplicati

Homepage of Duplicati

Overview

Duplicati backs up servers, desktops, laptops and NAS to cloud or on-premises storage, managed from a single console with per-machine status and centrally pushed backup policies. Data is encrypted with AES-256 on the machine before it reaches the network, and only changed blocks are sent. You supply your own storage — S3, Azure Blob, Backblaze B2, SFTP, NAS and others — or use Duplicati's own.

Best for
IT teams and MSPs backing up machines to their own cloud or on-prem storage from one console
Pricing
Free for up to 2 machines, then Pro at $2.50 per machine/month ($2 billed annually, up to 100 machines) and Enterprise from $3 per machine/month, with storage and Microsoft 365/Google Workspace backup charged separately.
Runs on
WebmacOSWindowsLinuxSelf-hostedCLI

Strengths and trade-offs

Strengths

  • Bring your own storage: no added storage fees or bandwidth limits
  • AES-256 encryption applied locally before data leaves the machine
  • Only changed blocks are transmitted, reducing WAN and egress load
  • Free tier for 2 machines; Pro at $2 per machine/month billed annually

Trade-offs

  • Free tier stops at 2 machines and the last 200 backups
  • Pro is capped at 100 machines; above that means Enterprise
  • Enterprise needs 10 machines minimum and a yearly contract
  • Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace backup cost $0.50 per user/month extra

How Duplicati markets itself

A structured read of the promise, proof and page design on Duplicati’s captured homepage.

Homepage capture

“Secure backup solution for hybrid cloud and on-prem”

  • Angle: Contrarian / anti-incumbent
  • Hero: Product screenshot

Pricing

Published plans and prices from Duplicati’s own pricing page.

How this score is made up

Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.

  • MCP support

    Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.

  • API quality

    Public API surface: machine-readable spec, official SDKs, documented auth, errors, rate limits and versioning.

  • Documentation

    Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.

  • Agent friendliness

    How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.

  • Pricing transparency

    Whether real prices are published, self-serve signup exists, and usage costs are knowable without a sales call.

  • Customer sentiment

    Third-party ratings, shrunk toward the catalogue mean by review volume and corroborated across independent sources.

  • Changelog

    A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.

  • Marketing site structure

    Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.

  • Page speed

    How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.

  • Operational trust

    Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.

Measured, but not part of the score

Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.

  • Openness

    Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.

  • Maintenance

    Release cadence and repository activity. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — it is only measurable for open repositories.

This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Duplicati’s score

Where this comes from

The Duplicati pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.

Alternatives in Storage & CDN

  • Ranked 1

    80.1 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Cloudflare

    Cloudflare · Global network for CDN, security, serverless compute and Zero Trust access

    Best for: Teams wanting CDN, DDoS protection, serverless compute and Zero Trust access on one network

  • Ranked 2

    65.4 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Dropbox

    Dropbox · Cloud storage, file sharing and team collaboration

    Best for: Teams needing shared cloud storage, large file transfers and admin control over synced folders

  • Ranked 3

    63.4 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Filestash

    Filestash · Self-hosted web file manager and gateway for existing storage

    Best for: Teams needing one web file manager and gateway in front of existing S3, SMB or SFTP storage

See all 42 alternatives to Duplicati

Is this your product?

Claim Duplicati to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.

Claim this business

Report a problem with this page

Report an issue with Duplicati