Digger
by Digger · Self-hostable Terraform CI/CD and background computers for AI agents
BenchRank score
Screenshots of Digger
Homepage
Overview
Digger is self-hostable, open source infrastructure tooling. Its Terraform CI/CD orchestrator plans on every pull request, applies on merge, detects drift, and manages state with rollback, running inside your own CI so secrets stay in your environment. A second product, opencomputer, provides background computers for AI agents that hibernate when idle and wake when needed.
- Best for
- Platform teams running Terraform who want PR automation and drift detection inside their own CI
- Pricing
- No prices or plans are shown in the captured text; the site describes the tooling as open source and self-hostable.
- Runs on
- Self-hosted
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- Runs in your CI, so secrets stay in your environment
- Plan on every PR, apply on merge, drift detection
- State management with rollback included
- Open source and self-hostable
Trade-offs
- Terraform only; no other IaC tooling mentioned
- You supply and maintain the CI system it runs in
- No pricing or plans published on the captured page
- The AI-agent computers product is described only in outline
Pricing
Published plans and prices from Digger’s own pricing page.
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
MCP support
Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.
API quality
Public API surface: machine-readable spec, official SDKs, documented auth, errors, rate limits and versioning.
Documentation
Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.
Agent friendliness
How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.
Changelog
A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.
Marketing site structure
Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.
Page speed
How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.
Operational trust
Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
Openness
Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.
Maintenance
Release cadence and repository activity. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — it is only measurable for open repositories.
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Digger’s score
Where this comes from
The Digger pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.
Alternatives in Orchestration & Scheduling
Ranked 1
82.4 — BenchRank score out of 100Prefect
Prefect · Python-decorator workflow orchestration for data, ML and agents
Best for: Python data and ML teams that want scheduled, self-retrying pipelines without hosting a scheduler
Ranked 2
80.9 — BenchRank score out of 100Temporal
Temporal · Durable execution for workflows, AI agents and long-running jobs
Best for: Engineering teams running long workflows, pipelines or AI agents that must survive crashes and retries
Ranked 3
78.9 — BenchRank score out of 100Inngest
Inngest · Durable execution for background jobs, workflows and AI agents
Best for: Teams adding retries, flow control and step-level tracing to background jobs and AI agents.
Is this your product?
Claim Digger to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.