BenchRank
#19 in Identity & Access ManagementUpdated 2026-08

Defguard

by Defguard · Self-hosted WireGuard VPN with connection-level MFA and identity management

BenchRank score

45.9 — BenchRank score out of 100

Screenshots of Defguard

Homepage · Defguard

Homepage of Defguard

Overview

Defguard is a self-hosted WireGuard VPN and identity platform written in Rust. It enforces multi-factor authentication at the VPN connection itself, using internal SSO (TOTP, email or mobile biometrics) or external providers such as Google, Microsoft EntraID, Okta and JumpCloud. A single control plane manages firewall ACLs, gateways and desktop and mobile clients.

Best for
Teams self-hosting a WireGuard VPN that needs connection-level MFA and SSO, LDAP or AD integration.
Pricing
No figures are published: the Open Source plan is free, Business is free up to 10 users and one location with pricing given only via a price calculator or licence request, and Enterprise is custom pricing through sales.
Runs on
iOSAndroidSelf-hosted

Strengths and trade-offs

Strengths

  • MFA enforced on each WireGuard connection, not just at login
  • Self-hosted, so keys and metadata stay on your own hardware
  • Open source, with public audits and daily CVE/SBOM reports
  • Firewall ACLs by SSO user and group across multiple gateways

Trade-offs

  • Business tier is free only up to 10 users and one VPN location
  • No prices published; Business needs a licence request, Enterprise a quote
  • External SSO, ACLs, LDAP/AD sync and SIEM streaming are paid tiers only
  • Device posture checks and attestation are listed as coming in 2.1 and 2.2

How Defguard markets itself

A structured read of the promise, proof and page design on Defguard’s captured homepage.

Homepage capture

“Enterprise VPN Re‑Engineered for Security and Total Sovereignty.”

  • Angle: Security / trust-led
  • Hero: Typography only

Pricing

Published plans and prices from Defguard’s own pricing page.

How this score is made up

Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.

  • MCP support

    Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.

  • API quality

    Public API surface: machine-readable spec, official SDKs, documented auth, errors, rate limits and versioning.

  • Documentation

    Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.

  • Agent friendliness

    How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.

  • Pricing transparency

    Whether real prices are published, self-serve signup exists, and usage costs are knowable without a sales call.

  • Changelog

    A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.

  • Marketing site structure

    Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.

  • Page speed

    How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.

  • Operational trust

    Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.

Measured, but not part of the score

Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.

  • Openness

    Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.

  • Maintenance

    Release cadence and repository activity. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — it is only measurable for open repositories.

This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Defguard’s score

Where this comes from

The Defguard pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.

Alternatives in Identity & Access Management

  • Ranked 1

    77 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Ory

    Ory · API-first identity and access management, self-hosted or managed

    Best for: Engineering teams wanting API-first identity and access management they can self-host or buy as SaaS

  • Ranked 2

    73.9 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Logto

    Logto · Open-source auth infrastructure with SSO, RBAC and multi-tenancy

    Best for: Developers adding auth, enterprise SSO and multi-tenancy to SaaS or AI apps without building it

  • Ranked 3

    70.9 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Hexclave

    Hexclave · Open-source auth, payments, email and analytics building blocks

    Best for: Startups wanting auth, payments, emails and analytics as one open-source, self-hostable platform.

See all 32 alternatives to Defguard

Is this your product?

Claim Defguard to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.

Claim this business

Report a problem with this page

Report an issue with Defguard