BenchRank
#24 in Storage & CDNUpdated 2026-08

CrashPlan

by CrashPlan · Backup and recovery for endpoints, servers, Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace

BenchRank score

41.3 — BenchRank score out of 100

Screenshots of CrashPlan

Homepage · CrashPlan

Homepage of CrashPlan

Overview

CrashPlan is a backup and recovery platform for endpoints, Windows servers, Microsoft 365 (Exchange Online, SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams) and Google Workspace (Gmail, Google Drive). Data can be backed up to CrashPlan's cloud, a customer's own Azure instance, a local destination or a third-party cloud. It includes automatic backup, unlimited versioning, point-in-time recovery, self-serve restore and built-in archiving.

Best for
IT teams backing up endpoints, servers, Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace data across an organisation.
Pricing
The captured pages show no prices; there is a pricing page link plus 'Get a Quote' and demo calls to action.
Runs on
WebSelf-hosted

Strengths and trade-offs

Strengths

  • Backs up to CrashPlan cloud, Azure, local or third-party storage
  • Unlimited versioning and point-in-time recovery
  • Covers endpoints, servers, Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace
  • Built-in archiving, plus legal hold and device migration uses

Trade-offs

  • No prices on the captured pages; buying runs through a quote or demo
  • Server backup is described for Windows servers only
  • Cited reviewer frames it as fitting organisations of 100+ users
  • Homepage claims such as lowest total cost of ownership are unevidenced

How CrashPlan markets itself

A structured read of the promise, proof and page design on CrashPlan’s captured homepage.

Homepage capture

“Easy, secure, & cost-effective backup and recovery”

  • Angle: Outcome / benefit-led
  • Hero: Product screenshot

Pricing

Published plans and prices from CrashPlan’s own pricing page.

How this score is made up

Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.

  • MCP support

    Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.

  • API quality

    Public API surface: machine-readable spec, official SDKs, documented auth, errors, rate limits and versioning.

  • Documentation

    Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.

  • Agent friendliness

    How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.

  • Pricing transparency

    Whether real prices are published, self-serve signup exists, and usage costs are knowable without a sales call.

  • Customer sentiment

    Third-party ratings, shrunk toward the catalogue mean by review volume and corroborated across independent sources.

  • Changelog

    A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.

  • Marketing site structure

    Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.

  • Page speed

    How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.

  • Operational trust

    Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.

Measured, but not part of the score

Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.

  • Openness

    Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.

This doesn’t look right — report a problem with CrashPlan’s score

Where this comes from

The CrashPlan pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.

Alternatives in Storage & CDN

  • Ranked 1

    80.1 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Cloudflare

    Cloudflare · Global network for CDN, security, serverless compute and Zero Trust access

    Best for: Teams wanting CDN, DDoS protection, serverless compute and Zero Trust access on one network

  • Ranked 2

    65.4 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Dropbox

    Dropbox · Cloud storage, file sharing and team collaboration

    Best for: Teams needing shared cloud storage, large file transfers and admin control over synced folders

  • Ranked 3

    63.4 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Filestash

    Filestash · Self-hosted web file manager and gateway for existing storage

    Best for: Teams needing one web file manager and gateway in front of existing S3, SMB or SFTP storage

See all 42 alternatives to CrashPlan

Is this your product?

Claim CrashPlan to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.

Claim this business

Report a problem with this page

Report an issue with CrashPlan