Codeberg
by Codeberg · Non-profit Git hosting for free and open-source projects
BenchRank score
Screenshots of Codeberg
Homepage
Overview
Codeberg is a non-profit, community-led service that hosts free and open-source projects. It provides Git hosting using Forgejo, along with Codeberg Pages, Woodpecker CI/CD and a Weblate instance (Codeberg Translate). It is maintained by the association Codeberg e.V. in Berlin and runs on servers the organisation controls in Europe, with no tracking or third-party cookies.
- Best for
- Free and open-source projects wanting non-profit Git hosting, CI/CD and translation, hosted in Europe.
- Pricing
- No prices are shown: the page states Codeberg does not charge users money and relies on optional donations and Codeberg e.V. memberships instead.
- Runs on
- Self-hosted
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- Non-profit, run by Codeberg e.V. in Berlin, Germany
- No tracking, no third-party cookies, no data selling
- Git hosting (Forgejo) plus Pages, CI/CD and a Weblate instance
- No charge to users; 658,496 projects and 398,271 users listed
Trade-offs
- Aimed at free and open-source projects, not general commercial hosting
- Cryptocurrency projects are no longer allowed under the Terms of Use
- LLM-generated content is restricted
- Funded by optional donations rather than paid plans
How Codeberg markets itself
A structured read of the promise, proof and page design on Codeberg’s captured homepage.
Homepage capture
“Software development, but free!”
- Angle: Open source / ownership
- Hero: Illustration
Pricing
Published plans and prices from Codeberg’s own pricing page.
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
MCP support
Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.
API quality
Public API surface: machine-readable spec, official SDKs, documented auth, errors, rate limits and versioning.
Documentation
Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.
Agent friendliness
How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.
Customer sentiment
Third-party ratings, shrunk toward the catalogue mean by review volume and corroborated across independent sources.
Changelog
A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.
Marketing site structure
Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.
Operational trust
Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
Openness
Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Codeberg’s score
Where this comes from
The Codeberg pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.
Alternatives in Build & Deployment
Ranked 1
82.4 — BenchRank score out of 100Windmill
Windmill · Code-first orchestration platform for internal software
Best for: Engineering teams building internal apps, workflows and data pipelines in code they self-host
Ranked 2
81.9 — BenchRank score out of 100Encore
Encore · Declare backend infrastructure in Go or TypeScript, deploy to your own cloud
Best for: Teams building Go or TypeScript backends on their own AWS or GCP without a platform team
Ranked 3
80.5 — BenchRank score out of 100GitLab
GitLab · DevSecOps platform with AI agents across planning, code, CI/CD and security
Best for: Teams that want planning, source control, CI/CD and security scanning in one platform.
Is this your product?
Claim Codeberg to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.