BenchRank
#35 in Application SecurityUpdated 2026-08

ClamAV

by ClamAV · Open-source antivirus engine for mail gateway scanning

BenchRank score

34.8 — BenchRank score out of 100

Screenshots of ClamAV

Homepage · ClamAV

Homepage of ClamAV

Overview

ClamAV is an open-source antivirus engine for detecting trojans, viruses, malware and other malicious threats, described on its site as a standard for mail gateway scanning. It provides a multi-threaded scanner daemon, command-line utilities for on-demand file scanning, and automatic signature updates. It supports multiple file formats and signature languages, plus file and archive unpacking.

Best for
Teams that need an open-source malware scanning engine on mail gateways and file servers.
Pricing
No prices are shown on the captured page; the software is presented as open-source and available to download.
Runs on
macOSWindowsLinux

Strengths and trade-offs

Strengths

  • Open-source; source code available from GitHub
  • Multi-threaded scanner daemon plus on-demand CLI tools
  • Automatic signature updates
  • Handles multiple file formats and archive unpacking

Trade-offs

  • An engine and CLI only; no GUI or hosted service is described
  • Self-hosted: you install, run and maintain it yourself
  • Page shows no pricing, support or SLA information

How ClamAV markets itself

A structured read of the promise, proof and page design on ClamAV’s captured homepage.

Homepage capture

“ClamAV®”

  • Angle: Security / trust-led
  • Hero: Illustration

Pricing

Published plans and prices from ClamAV’s own pricing page.

How this score is made up

Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.

  • MCP support

    Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.

  • API quality

    Public API surface: machine-readable spec, official SDKs, documented auth, errors, rate limits and versioning.

  • Documentation

    Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.

  • Agent friendliness

    How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.

  • Customer sentiment

    Third-party ratings, shrunk toward the catalogue mean by review volume and corroborated across independent sources.

  • Changelog

    A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.

  • Marketing site structure

    Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.

  • Page speed

    How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.

  • Operational trust

    Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.

Measured, but not part of the score

Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.

  • Openness

    Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.

  • Maintenance

    Release cadence and repository activity. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — it is only measurable for open repositories.

This doesn’t look right — report a problem with ClamAV’s score

Where this comes from

The ClamAV pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.

Alternatives in Application Security

  • Ranked 1

    83.1 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Sentry

    Sentry · Error tracking and application performance monitoring for developers

    Best for: Development teams wanting error monitoring, tracing and session replay tied to one trace

  • Ranked 2

    80.8 — BenchRank score out of 100

    GrowthBook

    GrowthBook · Warehouse-native feature flags, experimentation and product analytics

    Best for: Product and engineering teams running feature flags and experiments on their own data warehouse.

  • Ranked 3

    79.4 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Temps

    Temps · Self-hosted deploy platform with built-in analytics, errors and monitoring

    Best for: Teams self-hosting deployments who also want analytics, error tracking and uptime on their own server

See all 53 alternatives to ClamAV

Is this your product?

Claim ClamAV to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.

Claim this business

Report a problem with this page

Report an issue with ClamAV