Apache Subversion
by Apache Subversion · Open source centralised version control from the Apache Software Foundation
BenchRank score
Screenshots of Apache Subversion
Homepage
Overview
Apache Subversion is an open source, centralised version control system, founded in 2000 by CollabNet and now developed as a project of the Apache Software Foundation. It is distributed as source code archives and as precompiled binary packages for various platforms. Clients such as TortoiseSVN, IDE integrations and SVNKit are managed as separate projects outside the core.
- Best for
- Individuals and enterprises wanting a centralised, open source version control system
- Pricing
- No prices are shown; the software is distributed under the Apache License, Version 2.0, and the site invites donations to the ASF.
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- Open source under the Apache License, Version 2.0
- Source archives plus prebuilt binaries for various platforms
- Security fixes shipped: 1.14.5 addresses CVE-2024-46901
- Public mailing lists, issue tracker, wiki and online docs
Trade-offs
- Centralised model only; no distributed workflow is described
- GUI clients and IDE integrations are separate third-party projects
- Latest stable release dates from December 2024; 1.15.0 is still a release candidate
- Two CVEs fixed across 2024 releases, so upgrades must be tracked
Pricing
Published plans and prices from Apache Subversion’s own pricing page.
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
MCP support
Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.
API quality
Public API surface: machine-readable spec, official SDKs, documented auth, errors, rate limits and versioning.
Documentation
Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.
Agent friendliness
How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.
Changelog
A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.
Marketing site structure
Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.
Page speed
How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.
Operational trust
Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
Openness
Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Apache Subversion’s score
Where this comes from
The Apache Subversion pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.
Alternatives in Build & Deployment
Ranked 1
82.4 — BenchRank score out of 100Windmill
Windmill · Code-first orchestration platform for internal software
Best for: Engineering teams building internal apps, workflows and data pipelines in code they self-host
Ranked 2
81.9 — BenchRank score out of 100Encore
Encore · Declare backend infrastructure in Go or TypeScript, deploy to your own cloud
Best for: Teams building Go or TypeScript backends on their own AWS or GCP without a platform team
Ranked 3
80.5 — BenchRank score out of 100GitLab
GitLab · DevSecOps platform with AI agents across planning, code, CI/CD and security
Best for: Teams that want planning, source control, CI/CD and security scanning in one platform.
Is this your product?
Claim Apache Subversion to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.