Aircrack-ng
by Aircrack-ng · Command-line suite for assessing WiFi network security
BenchRank score
Screenshots of Aircrack-ng
Homepage
Overview
Aircrack-ng is a suite of command-line tools for assessing WiFi network security. It handles packet capture and export for processing by other tools, attacks such as replay, deauthentication, fake access points and packet injection, checks of WiFi card and driver capabilities, and cracking of WEP and WPA PSK (WPA 1 and 2). It runs primarily on Linux, plus Windows, macOS, the BSDs and Solaris.
- Best for
- Security testers assessing WiFi networks from the command line, including WEP and WPA PSK cracking.
- Pricing
- No pricing is shown; the site offers downloads of Aircrack-ng 1.7 and its sources without stating any price.
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- Covers monitoring, injection attacks, testing and cracking
- Command-line tools script easily; third-party GUIs exist
- Runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, the BSDs and Solaris
Trade-offs
- Cracking covers WEP and WPA PSK only, not WPA Enterprise
- No GUI of its own — every tool is command line
- Latest release, 1.7, dates from May 2022
- Injection can need network managers killed via airmon-ng check kill
Pricing
Published plans and prices from Aircrack-ng’s own pricing page.
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
MCP support
Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.
Documentation
Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.
Agent friendliness
How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.
Changelog
A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.
Marketing site structure
Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.
Page speed
How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.
Operational trust
Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
Openness
Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.
Maintenance
Release cadence and repository activity. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — it is only measurable for open repositories.
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Aircrack-ng’s score
Where this comes from
The Aircrack-ng pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.
Alternatives in Application Security
Ranked 1
83.1 — BenchRank score out of 100Sentry
Sentry · Error tracking and application performance monitoring for developers
Best for: Development teams wanting error monitoring, tracing and session replay tied to one trace
Ranked 2
80.8 — BenchRank score out of 100GrowthBook
GrowthBook · Warehouse-native feature flags, experimentation and product analytics
Best for: Product and engineering teams running feature flags and experiments on their own data warehouse.
Ranked 3
79.4 — BenchRank score out of 100Temps
Temps · Self-hosted deploy platform with built-in analytics, errors and monitoring
Best for: Teams self-hosting deployments who also want analytics, error tracking and uptime on their own server
Is this your product?
Claim Aircrack-ng to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.