Twake Mail
by Twake Mail · Open-source JMAP e-mail with PGP encryption and on-premise deployment
BenchRank score
Screenshots of Twake Mail
Homepage
Overview
Twake Mail is an open-source e-mail client from LINAGORA built on the JMAP protocol rather than IMAP. It offers PGP encryption, built-in protection against spam, phishing and hacking, custom filters and search, and inbox sharing and delegation. Clients are built with Flutter for web, Android and iOS, and the software can be run on-premise.
- Best for
- Teams wanting an open-source, self-hostable e-mail service with PGP encryption
- Pricing
- No prices are shown; the page offers free sign-up and a contact form for on-premise deployment.
- Runs on
- iOSAndroidSelf-hosted
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- Open source, with code on GitHub for review and contribution
- Uses JMAP; site claims 30x better efficiency than IMAP
- PGP encryption with built-in spam and phishing protection
- On-premise option, plus Contacts, Calendar, Chat and Drive links
Trade-offs
- No prices published; on-premise deployment goes via a contact form
- The 30x efficiency claim over IMAP is given without any benchmark
- AI reply features are named but not described anywhere on the page
How Twake Mail markets itself
A structured read of the promise, proof and page design on Twake Mail’s captured homepage.
Homepage capture
“The new Open Source standard for secure professional e-mail”
- Angle: Open source / ownership
- Hero: Product screenshot
Pricing
Published plans and prices from Twake Mail’s own pricing page.
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
MCP support
Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.
Documentation
Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.
Agent friendliness
How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.
Changelog
A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.
Marketing site structure
Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.
Page speed
How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.
Operational trust
Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
Openness
Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.
Maintenance
Release cadence and repository activity. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — it is only measurable for open repositories.
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Twake Mail’s score
Where this comes from
The Twake Mail pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.
Alternatives in Collaboration & Communication
Ranked 1
88.5 — BenchRank score out of 100Novu
Novu · Open-source notification infrastructure for multi-channel product messaging
Best for: Development teams adding multi-channel product notifications to a web or mobile app.
Ranked 2
80.8 — BenchRank score out of 100Plane
Plane · Project management, wiki and AI agents in one workspace
Best for: Teams leaving Jira or Linear that want projects, docs and AI agents in one self-hostable tool
Ranked 3
78.4 — BenchRank score out of 100Slack
Slack · Channel-based team messaging with built-in AI and workflow automation
Best for: Teams wanting channel-based messaging, huddles and AI summaries in one place, plus external chat.
Is this your product?
Claim Twake Mail to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.