
Trigger.dev
by Trigger · Open source TypeScript platform for long-running tasks and AI workflows
73.3 — BenchRank score out of 100
Screenshots of Trigger.dev
Homepage Pricing page
Overview
Trigger.dev is an open source platform for writing background tasks and AI workflows in TypeScript. Task code lives in a trigger folder in your own repo, then is bundled and deployed to Trigger.dev's managed workers, running with no timeouts plus retries, queues, concurrency limits and atomic versioned deploys. A Realtime API streams run status and LLM responses to your frontend.
- Best for
- TypeScript teams offloading long-running background jobs and AI agent runs to managed infrastructure
- Pricing
- Free plan with $5/month credits, then Hobby at $10/month and Pro at $50/month with matching included credits, plus usage-based compute from $0.0000169/sec and $0.000025 per run invocation; Enterprise is custom.
- Runs on
- Self-hostedCLI
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- No timeouts, with automatic retries and checkpointing
- Apache 2.0 licensed and self-hostable
- Realtime API streams run status and LLM output to the frontend
- Charged only while tasks execute; long waits are checkpointed
Trade-offs
- Free plan stops running tasks once the $5 monthly credit is used
- Log retention is 1 day on Free and 7 days on Hobby; 30 days needs Pro
- Tasks are written in TypeScript; Python runs only via a build extension
- SSO, RBAC and SOC 2 report are Enterprise-only
Pricing
Published plans from Trigger.dev’s own pricing page, in USD. Usage charges and add-ons may apply on top.
| Plan | Monthly | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Freeper month |
|
| Hobby | $10per month |
|
| Pro | $50per month |
|
| Enterprise | Contact sales |
|
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
- MCP support
- 60 out of 100
- API quality
- 30 out of 100
- Documentation
- 80 out of 100
- Agent friendliness
- 97 out of 100
- Pricing transparency
- 100 out of 100
- Changelog
- 100 out of 100
- Marketing site structure
- 80 out of 100
- Operational trust
- 75 out of 100
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
- Openness
- 85 out of 100
- Maintenance
- 100 out of 100
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Trigger.dev’s score
Alternatives in Frameworks & Libraries
Ranked 1
81.6 — BenchRank score out of 100Encore
Encore · Declare backend infrastructure in Go or TypeScript, deploy to your own cloud
Best for: Teams building Go or TypeScript backends on their own AWS or GCP without a platform team
Ranked 2
78.9 — BenchRank score out of 100Builder.io
Builder · Collaborative platform for building software with AI agents
Best for: Product teams wanting designers, PMs and marketers to edit the real codebase alongside engineers
Ranked 3
78.6 — BenchRank score out of 100Convex
Convex · Reactive TypeScript backend with database, functions, sync and search
Best for: Teams building TypeScript apps that want database, functions, sync and file storage in one backend


