BenchRank
#53 in Collaboration & CommunicationUpdated 2026-08

Sync-in

by Sync-in · Open-source, self-hosted file sync, sharing and document collaboration

BenchRank score

39.6 — BenchRank score out of 100

Screenshots of Sync-in

Homepage · Sync-in

Homepage of Sync-in

Overview

Sync-in is an open-source platform for storing, sharing, syncing and co-editing files on infrastructure you control. Files sit in spaces with groups, guests, managers and nested shares, and the same permissions apply across the web interface, WebDAV, desktop sync clients, editors and APIs. Real-time document editing, full-text search, comments and activity tracking are included.

Best for
Organisations that need file sharing and co-editing to stay on infrastructure they control.
Pricing
No prices are shown; the captured page presents an open-source platform you host yourself, alongside enterprise support and hosting partners with no figures given.

Strengths and trade-offs

Strengths

  • Open source and self-hosted, with no proprietary lock-in
  • Files stay readable outside the app; existing content can be anchored
  • One permission model across web, WebDAV, sync, editors and APIs
  • Desktop sync for Windows, macOS and Linux plus full-text search

Trade-offs

  • You choose and run the hosting yourself, or go via a partner
  • Enterprise support is a separate engagement with no published pricing
  • The comparison pages are the vendor's own framing of rival platforms

How Sync-in markets itself

A structured read of the promise, proof and page design on Sync-in’s captured homepage.

Homepage capture

“Your data stays yours”

  • Angle: Open source / ownership
  • Hero: Product screenshot

Pricing

Published plans and prices from Sync-in’s own pricing page.

How this score is made up

Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.

  • MCP support

    Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.

  • API quality

    Public API surface: machine-readable spec, official SDKs, documented auth, errors, rate limits and versioning.

  • Documentation

    Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.

  • Agent friendliness

    How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.

  • Changelog

    A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.

  • Marketing site structure

    Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.

  • Page speed

    How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.

  • Operational trust

    Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.

Measured, but not part of the score

Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.

  • Openness

    Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.

  • Maintenance

    Release cadence and repository activity. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — it is only measurable for open repositories.

This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Sync-in’s score

Where this comes from

The Sync-in pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.

Alternatives in Collaboration & Communication

  • Ranked 1

    88.5 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Novu

    Novu · Open-source notification infrastructure for multi-channel product messaging

    Best for: Development teams adding multi-channel product notifications to a web or mobile app.

  • Ranked 2

    80.8 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Plane

    Plane · Project management, wiki and AI agents in one workspace

    Best for: Teams leaving Jira or Linear that want projects, docs and AI agents in one self-hostable tool

  • Ranked 3

    78.4 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Slack

    Slack · Channel-based team messaging with built-in AI and workflow automation

    Best for: Teams wanting channel-based messaging, huddles and AI summaries in one place, plus external chat.

See all 91 alternatives to Sync-in

Is this your product?

Claim Sync-in to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.

Claim this business

Report a problem with this page

Report an issue with Sync-in