BenchRank
#14 in AI Development PlatformsUpdated 2026-08

Kortix

by Suna · Open-source AI agent platform run from a git repo you own

BenchRank score

70.8 — BenchRank score out of 100

Screenshots of Kortix

Homepage · Kortix

Homepage of Kortix

Overview

Kortix is an open-source platform for running AI agents across a company. Agents, skills, memory, connector config and triggers are held as files in one git repo, and each session boots its own isolated Linux machine, does the work, and lands it on main as a change request you read as a diff. Sessions can be started from the web, Slack, Teams, mobile, CLI, API, cron or webhooks.

Best for
Teams wanting an open-source, self-hostable platform for AI agents wired into their own tools and models
Pricing
Self-hosting is free and open source; managed cloud is stated as $40 per seat per month plus usage.
Runs on
iOSAndroidmacOSLinuxSelf-hostedCLI

Strengths and trade-offs

Strengths

  • Open source; self-host, VPC, on-prem, or managed cloud
  • Agents, skills, memory and config are files in a git repo you own
  • Model-agnostic — your own keys or any OpenAI-compatible endpoint
  • 3,000+ app connectors, plus MCP, OpenAPI, GraphQL and raw HTTP

Trade-offs

  • SOC 2 Type I and Type II are both listed as in progress
  • Managed cloud is $40/seat/month plus usage, so model costs sit on top
  • Git, YAML and CLI-centred setup assumes engineering skills in the team
  • Only one headline price is published; no tier breakdown on the page

Pricing

Published plans and prices from Kortix’s own pricing page.

How this score is made up

Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.

  • MCP support

    Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.

  • API quality

    Public API surface: machine-readable spec, official SDKs, documented auth, errors, rate limits and versioning.

  • Documentation

    Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.

  • Agent friendliness

    How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.

  • Pricing transparency

    Whether real prices are published, self-serve signup exists, and usage costs are knowable without a sales call.

  • Changelog

    A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.

  • Marketing site structure

    Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.

  • Page speed

    How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.

  • Operational trust

    Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.

Measured, but not part of the score

Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.

  • Openness

    Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.

  • Maintenance

    Release cadence and repository activity. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — it is only measurable for open repositories.

This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Kortix’s score

Where this comes from

The Kortix pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.

Alternatives in AI Development Platforms

  • Ranked 1

    85.5 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Mem0

    Mem0 · Hosted memory layer for AI agents, with Python and Node SDKs

    Best for: Developer teams adding persistent memory to AI agents through a hosted API, with a free tier

  • Ranked 2

    83.7 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Nango

    Nango · Code-first integration platform covering 900+ APIs

    Best for: Product teams building many third-party API integrations into a SaaS product or AI agent

  • Ranked 3

    81.4 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Supermemory

    Supermemory · Memory and retrieval layer for AI agents

    Best for: Developers giving AI agents persistent memory and retrieval through a single hosted API.

See all 48 alternatives to Kortix

Is this your product?

Claim Suna to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.

Claim this business

Report a problem with this page

Report an issue with Kortix