
PearPass
by PearPass · Open-source password manager with peer-to-peer sync and no cloud storage
BenchRank score
Screenshots of PearPass
Homepage
Overview
PearPass is an open-source password manager that stores logins, identities, cards, notes, Wi-Fi details, recovery phrases and passkeys on your own devices rather than a provider's servers. Devices sync over an encrypted peer-to-peer network, with end-to-end encryption using cryptographic primitives from Libsodium. Apps cover iOS, Android, Windows, macOS, Linux and Chromium browsers.
- Best for
- People who want a password manager that syncs peer-to-peer and keeps data off cloud servers.
- Pricing
- No prices or plans appear on the captured pages; the product is described as 100% open source with a direct download.
- Runs on
- iOSAndroidmacOSWindowsLinuxBrowser extension
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- Independent security audit by Secfault Security
- Peer-to-peer sync keeps vault data on your own devices
- Source code published on GitHub for inspection
- Imports from 1Password, LastPass and Bitwarden
Trade-offs
- Browser extension only works while the desktop app is running
- No cloud copy; the vault exists only on devices you own
- Site notes pairing issues can occur during ongoing iteration
- Support is a contact form plus a Keet community chat
Pricing
Published plans and prices from PearPass’s own pricing page.
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
MCP support
Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.
Documentation
Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.
Agent friendliness
How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.
Changelog
A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.
Marketing site structure
Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.
Page speed
How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.
Operational trust
Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
Openness
Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.
Maintenance
Release cadence and repository activity. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — it is only measurable for open repositories.
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with PearPass’s score
Where this comes from
The PearPass pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.
Alternatives in Secrets & Key Management
Ranked 1
71.4 — BenchRank score out of 100Infisical
Infisical · Secrets, certificate and privileged access management for developers
Best for: Engineering teams wanting secrets, certificates and privileged access managed on one platform
Ranked 2
66.7 — BenchRank score out of 100Unkey
UnKey · API deployment, gateway and observability on one platform
Best for: Teams that want API deployment, key auth, rate limiting and logs from a single vendor
Ranked 3
61.8 — BenchRank score out of 100Vault
HashiCorp Vault · Secrets management and encryption as a service via UI, CLI or HTTP API
Best for: Security and platform teams storing secrets, issuing database credentials and encrypting data
Is this your product?
Claim PearPass to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.


