BenchRank
#29 in Project & Work ManagementUpdated 2026-08

Orgnise

by Orgnise · Team knowledge, documents and project boards in one workspace

BenchRank score

45.5 — BenchRank score out of 100

Screenshots of Orgnise

Homepage · Orgnise

Homepage of Orgnise

Overview

Orgnise is a collaboration tool that holds a team's knowledge, documents and projects in one place. Content is structured as teams, then workspaces per subject or project, then collections of related pages, written in a Notion-style WYSIWYG editor. A collection can be shown as columns on a board to track work through stages, and members are invited into the shared team.

Best for
Small teams wanting one place for team notes, docs and project boards instead of several tools.
Pricing
Free tier for one user, then Pro at $24/month and Business at $59/month, with Enterprise priced on enquiry.
Runs on
Web

Strengths and trade-offs

Strengths

  • Free tier: 1 user, 3 workspaces, 30 pages, no card needed
  • Notion-style WYSIWYG editor for rich documents
  • Collections can become board columns for workflow stages
  • Teams, workspaces and collections give a clear hierarchy

Trade-offs

  • Homepage asks you to join a waitlist, so access may not be immediate
  • Hard caps per plan: Pro allows 5 users, 10 workspaces and 200 pages
  • Free tier gets community support only; chat support starts at $59/month
  • Captured pages mention no integrations, API, mobile or offline use

How Orgnise markets itself

A structured read of the promise, proof and page design on Orgnise’s captured homepage.

Homepage capture

“Create, Collaborate and Organize”

  • Angle: All-in-one / consolidation
  • Hero: Product screenshot

Pricing

Published plans and prices from Orgnise’s own pricing page.

How this score is made up

Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.

  • MCP support

    Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.

  • API quality

    Public API surface: machine-readable spec, official SDKs, documented auth, errors, rate limits and versioning.

  • Documentation

    Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.

  • Agent friendliness

    How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.

  • Pricing transparency

    Whether real prices are published, self-serve signup exists, and usage costs are knowable without a sales call.

  • Changelog

    A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.

  • Marketing site structure

    Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.

  • Page speed

    How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.

  • Operational trust

    Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.

Measured, but not part of the score

Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.

  • Openness

    Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.

This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Orgnise’s score

Where this comes from

The Orgnise pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.

Alternatives in Project & Work Management

  • Ranked 1

    86.9 — BenchRank score out of 100

    DevClocked

    devclocked · Time and token tracking for human and AI-agent engineering work

    Best for: Solo developers, teams and agencies who need time, agent-run and token data tied to shipped work.

  • Ranked 2

    80.8 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Plane

    Plane · Project management, wiki and AI agents in one workspace

    Best for: Teams leaving Jira or Linear that want projects, docs and AI agents in one self-hostable tool

  • Ranked 3

    80.5 — BenchRank score out of 100

    GitLab

    GitLab · DevSecOps platform with AI agents across planning, code, CI/CD and security

    Best for: Teams that want planning, source control, CI/CD and security scanning in one platform.

See all 61 alternatives to Orgnise

Is this your product?

Claim Orgnise to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.

Claim this business

Report a problem with this page

Report an issue with Orgnise