
NocoDB
by NocoDB · Spreadsheet interface over your own Postgres or MySQL database
69.7 — BenchRank score out of 100
Screenshots of NocoDB
Homepage Pricing page
Overview
NocoDB puts a spreadsheet interface over a database, either one it hosts or an external Postgres or MySQL you connect to it. Records can be shown as a grid, Kanban board, gallery, form or calendar, and the same data is reachable through REST APIs, webhooks and SQL. It is offered as a cloud service and as a self-hosted fair-source product.
- Best for
- Teams that want a spreadsheet-style interface over their own Postgres or MySQL data, without code
- Pricing
- Free tier, then $12, $24 and $45 per seat/month billed annually, with unlimited-seat bundles at $108/month (Plus) and $216/month (Business) and contact-sales Enterprise.
- Runs on
- WebSelf-hosted
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- Connects to existing Postgres or MySQL, or uses hosted storage
- Grid, Kanban, Gallery, Form and Calendar views of the same data
- REST API, webhooks and Swagger spec available from the free tier
- Cloud and self-hosted options; fair-source with public downloads
Trade-offs
- Free plan caps at 3 editors, 1,000 records and 1,000 API calls a month
- External DB connections limited: 1 on Plus, 10 on Business and Scale
- Row-level security and audit logs start at the $45/seat Scale plan
- Single workspace on every plan below Enterprise
Pricing
Published plans from NocoDB’s own pricing page, in USD. Usage charges and add-ons may apply on top.
| Plan | Monthly | Annual (per month) | Includes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | Freeper user | Free |
|
| Plus | —per seat | $12 |
|
| Business | —per seat | $24 |
|
| Scale | —per seat | $45 |
|
| Enterprise | Contact sales | — |
|
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
- MCP support
- 60 out of 100
- API quality
- 30 out of 100
- Documentation
- 100 out of 100
- Agent friendliness
- 75 out of 100
- Pricing transparency
- 100 out of 100
- Changelog
- 100 out of 100
- Marketing site structure
- 60 out of 100
- Operational trust
- 40 out of 100
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
- Openness
- 55 out of 100
- Maintenance
- 100 out of 100
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with NocoDB’s score
Alternatives in Frameworks & Libraries
Ranked 1
81.6 — BenchRank score out of 100Encore
Encore · Declare backend infrastructure in Go or TypeScript, deploy to your own cloud
Best for: Teams building Go or TypeScript backends on their own AWS or GCP without a platform team
Ranked 2
78.9 — BenchRank score out of 100Builder.io
Builder · Collaborative platform for building software with AI agents
Best for: Product teams wanting designers, PMs and marketers to edit the real codebase alongside engineers
Ranked 3
78.6 — BenchRank score out of 100Convex
Convex · Reactive TypeScript backend with database, functions, sync and search
Best for: Teams building TypeScript apps that want database, functions, sync and file storage in one backend


