BenchRank
#17 in Chat AssistantsUpdated 2026-08

Lumo

by Lumo by Proton · Privacy-first AI chat assistant with zero-access encrypted conversations

BenchRank score

41.4 — BenchRank score out of 100

Screenshots of Lumo

Homepage · Lumo

Homepage of Lumo

Overview

Lumo is an AI chat assistant from Proton. Conversations are stored with zero-access encryption, and Proton states it cannot read them or use them to train models; the code is open source. Alongside chat it generates images, analyses data and organises work into Projects, and can pull context from files and folders linked via Proton Drive.

Best for
People who want a general AI chat assistant whose conversations the provider cannot read.
Pricing
Free plan at £0.00, then Lumo AI Plus at £10.39/month, or £7.99/month billed annually (£95.88 a year).
Runs on
iOSAndroid

Strengths and trade-offs

Strengths

  • Chats stored with zero-access encryption; Proton cannot read them
  • Code is open source, so the privacy claims can be checked
  • European service under GDPR; delete your account at any time
  • Free plan needs no credit card

Trade-offs

  • Free plan limits messages, chat history, images and caps Projects at 1
  • Business plan pricing is not published on the pricing page
  • Underlying models are unnamed; only 'Max model usage' limits are described
  • Only Proton Drive is named for adding file context; no other integrations

How Lumo markets itself

A structured read of the promise, proof and page design on Lumo’s captured homepage.

Homepage capture

“The confidential AI chat assistant”

  • Angle: Security / trust-led
  • Hero: Form in hero

Pricing

Published plans and prices from Lumo’s own pricing page.

How this score is made up

Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.

  • MCP support

    Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.

  • API quality

    Public API surface: machine-readable spec, official SDKs, documented auth, errors, rate limits and versioning.

  • Documentation

    Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.

  • Agent friendliness

    How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.

  • Pricing transparency

    Whether real prices are published, self-serve signup exists, and usage costs are knowable without a sales call.

  • Customer sentiment

    Third-party ratings, shrunk toward the catalogue mean by review volume and corroborated across independent sources.

  • Changelog

    A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.

  • Marketing site structure

    Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.

  • Page speed

    How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.

  • Operational trust

    Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.

Measured, but not part of the score

Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.

  • Openness

    Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.

  • Maintenance

    Release cadence and repository activity. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — it is only measurable for open repositories.

This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Lumo’s score

Where this comes from

The Lumo pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.

Alternatives in Chat Assistants

  • Ranked 1

    77.8 — BenchRank score out of 100

    LobeHub

    LobeHub · Hosted multi-agent platform with a skills and MCP marketplace

    Best for: Individuals and small teams wanting to run several AI agents on a hosted, credit-metered platform

  • Ranked 2

    77.3 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Browser Use

    Browser Use · Open-source browser automation with hosted stealth browsers and agents

    Best for: Teams building web automation that need hosted stealth browsers and agent APIs, plus an open-source library

  • Ranked 3

    71.3 — BenchRank score out of 100

    OpenClaw

    OpenClaw · Open-source AI assistant that runs on your own machine

    Best for: People who want an AI assistant they run themselves and drive from WhatsApp, Telegram or Discord.

See all 28 alternatives to Lumo

Is this your product?

Claim Lumo by Proton to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.

Claim this business

Report a problem with this page

Report an issue with Lumo