BenchRank
#25 in Product AnalyticsUpdated 2026-08

Lua.sh

by Lua.sh · Open-source link shortening with an API and click analytics

BenchRank score

37.8 — BenchRank score out of 100

Screenshots of Lua.sh

Homepage · Lua.sh

Homepage of Lua.sh

Overview

Lua.sh is an open-source link shortening platform for creating and managing short links programmatically. It offers custom domains, QR code generation, SSL-secured redirects and a dashboard for organising links, plus an API with per-plan rate limits. Analytics cover clicks, referrers and geographic data through a real-time events stream.

Best for
Marketing and developer teams who need branded short links with API access and click analytics.
Pricing
Free plan at $0/month, then $19/month (Starter), $49/month (Pro) and $149/month (Growth); the Scale tier's price is not shown, and annual billing is stated to give two months free.
Runs on
Web

Strengths and trade-offs

Strengths

  • Open source, with a free plan at $0/month
  • API access, QR codes and SSL included on every plan
  • Custom domains from 3 on Free up to 500 on Scale
  • 30-day money-back guarantee on paid plans

Trade-offs

  • Tracked clicks are capped: 10,000/mo on Free, 50,000/mo on Starter
  • Free plan is one user, 3 domains and 30-day analytics retention
  • Priority support and an account manager come only with Scale
  • Scale tier's price is not published on the pricing page

How Lua.sh markets itself

A structured read of the promise, proof and page design on Lua.sh’s captured homepage.

Homepage capture

“URL Shortening Built for Developers”

  • Angle: Developer-first
  • Hero: Typography only

Pricing

Published plans and prices from Lua.sh’s own pricing page.

How this score is made up

Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.

  • MCP support

    Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.

  • Documentation

    Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.

  • Agent friendliness

    How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.

  • Pricing transparency

    Whether real prices are published, self-serve signup exists, and usage costs are knowable without a sales call.

  • Changelog

    A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.

  • Marketing site structure

    Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.

  • Page speed

    How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.

  • Operational trust

    Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.

Measured, but not part of the score

Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.

  • Openness

    Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.

  • Maintenance

    Release cadence and repository activity. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — it is only measurable for open repositories.

This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Lua.sh’s score

Where this comes from

The Lua.sh pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.

Alternatives in Product Analytics

  • Ranked 1

    80.8 — BenchRank score out of 100

    GrowthBook

    GrowthBook · Warehouse-native feature flags, experimentation and product analytics

    Best for: Product and engineering teams running feature flags and experiments on their own data warehouse.

  • Ranked 2

    80.7 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Databuddy

    Databuddy · Cookieless analytics, error tracking and feature flags in one platform

    Best for: Developers wanting analytics, errors, vitals and flags in one cookieless tool at modest event volumes.

  • Ranked 3

    80.5 — BenchRank score out of 100

    PostHog

    PostHog · Analytics, replay, flags and error tracking with automated bug fixes

    Best for: Product and engineering teams wanting analytics, replay, flags and error tracking in one tool

See all 29 alternatives to Lua.sh

Is this your product?

Claim Lua.sh to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.

Claim this business

Report a problem with this page

Report an issue with Lua.sh