
LiteLLM
by LiteLLM · Open-source AI gateway for routing, spend control and governance
75.4 — BenchRank score out of 100
Screenshots of LiteLLM
Homepage Pricing page
Overview
LiteLLM is an open-source AI gateway that puts LLM providers, agents and MCP servers behind one OpenAI-compatible API and login. It tracks spend per key, user, team and org, applies budgets and rate limits that stop requests at the cap, and routes across providers. You self-host it via Docker, Helm or Terraform on your own Postgres and Redis.
- Best for
- Platform teams self-hosting one gateway for LLM access, spend caps and routing across providers.
- Pricing
- The self-hosted open-source gateway is free with no licence fee; Enterprise is an annual contract sized to request capacity, with no figures published.
- Runs on
- Self-hosted
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- One OpenAI-compatible API to 140+ providers and 1,800+ models
- Hard budgets per key, team and org; requests stop at the cap
- MIT-licensed core, self-hostable including air-gapped
- Docker, Helm and Terraform deploys onto your own Postgres and Redis
Trade-offs
- You run and maintain it yourself, including Postgres and Redis
- SSO, RBAC and audit logs are Enterprise-only, not in the free tier
- Enterprise price is not published: annual contract, quoted by sales
- Latency benchmarks are LiteLLM's own, run against a mock upstream
Pricing
Published plans from LiteLLM’s own pricing page, in USD. Usage charges and add-ons may apply on top.
| Plan | Monthly | Annual (per month) | Includes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open Source | Freeself-hosted | Free |
|
| Enterprise | Contact sales | — |
|
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
- MCP support
- 60 out of 100
- API quality
- 70 out of 100
- Documentation
- 80 out of 100
- Agent friendliness
- 72 out of 100
- Pricing transparency
- 100 out of 100
- Changelog
- 100 out of 100
- Marketing site structure
- 80 out of 100
- Operational trust
- 40 out of 100
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
- Openness
- 55 out of 100
- Maintenance
- 100 out of 100
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with LiteLLM’s score
Alternatives in AI Development Platforms
Ranked 1
84.6 — BenchRank score out of 100Mem0
Mem0 · Hosted memory layer for AI agents, with Python and Node SDKs
Best for: Developer teams adding persistent memory to AI agents through a hosted API, with a free tier
Ranked 2
84 — BenchRank score out of 100Nango
Nango · Code-first integration platform covering 900+ APIs
Best for: Product teams building many third-party API integrations into a SaaS product or AI agent
Ranked 3
82.4 — BenchRank score out of 100Supermemory
Supermemory · Memory and retrieval layer for AI agents
Best for: Developers giving AI agents persistent memory and retrieval through a single hosted API.


