BenchRank
#36 in Monitoring & ObservabilityUpdated 2026-08

LibreSpeed

by LibreSpeed · Open source browser speed test you can self-host

BenchRank score

36.8 — BenchRank score out of 100

Screenshots of LibreSpeed

Homepage · LibreSpeed

Homepage of LibreSpeed

Overview

LibreSpeed is a free and open source speed test that runs in a web browser and reports download and upload speeds in Mbps. You can run it on the public instance, choosing from a list of sponsor-hosted servers in various countries, or self-host it on a PHP, Golang, Rust or Node server. It uses no Flash, Java or WebSockets, and is licensed under the LGPL.

Best for
Anyone wanting a browser-based connection speed test, or admins who want to self-host one
Pricing
No prices are shown; the page states the software is free and open source under the LGPL

Strengths and trade-offs

Strengths

  • Free and open source under the LGPL
  • Runs in the browser with no Flash, Java or WebSockets
  • Self-hostable on PHP, Golang, Rust or Node servers
  • Public test servers across Europe, North America, Japan and Russia

Trade-offs

  • Self-hosting needs your own PHP, Golang, Rust or Node server
  • Public instance depends on sponsor-donated third-party servers
  • The page only shows download and upload speeds in Mbps
  • A test cannot start until you accept the privacy policy

How LibreSpeed markets itself

A structured read of the promise, proof and page design on LibreSpeed’s captured homepage.

Homepage capture

“Free and Open Source Speedtest.”

  • Angle: Open source / ownership
  • Hero: Interactive demo

Pricing

Published plans and prices from LibreSpeed’s own pricing page.

How this score is made up

Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.

  • MCP support

    Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.

  • Documentation

    Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.

  • Agent friendliness

    How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.

  • Customer sentiment

    Third-party ratings, shrunk toward the catalogue mean by review volume and corroborated across independent sources.

  • Changelog

    A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.

  • Marketing site structure

    Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.

  • Page speed

    How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.

  • Operational trust

    Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.

Measured, but not part of the score

Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.

  • Openness

    Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.

  • Maintenance

    Release cadence and repository activity. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — it is only measurable for open repositories.

This doesn’t look right — report a problem with LibreSpeed’s score

Where this comes from

The LibreSpeed pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.

Alternatives in Monitoring & Observability

  • Ranked 1

    87.4 — BenchRank score out of 100

    openstatus

    OpenStatus · Open source status pages with uptime monitoring from 28 regions

    Best for: Teams that need a public status page and uptime checks while working towards SOC 2.

  • Ranked 2

    86.7 — BenchRank score out of 100

    OneUptime

    OneUptime · Open-source observability and incident management on one platform

    Best for: Teams wanting monitoring, on-call, status pages and observability on one open-source platform

  • Ranked 3

    83.1 — BenchRank score out of 100

    Sentry

    Sentry · Error tracking and application performance monitoring for developers

    Best for: Development teams wanting error monitoring, tracing and session replay tied to one trace

See all 48 alternatives to LibreSpeed

Is this your product?

Claim LibreSpeed to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.

Claim this business

Report a problem with this page

Report an issue with LibreSpeed