
Hive
by Hive · Open-source schema registry, analytics and gateway for GraphQL federation
47.6 — BenchRank score out of 100
Screenshots of Hive
Homepage Pricing page
Overview
Hive is an MIT-licensed platform for managing GraphQL APIs. Its schema registry publishes and composes federated subgraphs and flags breaking changes and composition errors, alongside usage analytics and a gateway (Hive Gateway in JavaScript, Hive Router in Rust) with Apollo Federation v1 and v2 support. It can be used as a hosted service or self-hosted.
- Best for
- Teams running federated GraphQL APIs that want a self-hostable schema registry and gateway
- Pricing
- Hobby is free with 1M operations a month, Pro is $20/month including 1M operations then $10 per additional million, and Enterprise is a custom contract.
- Runs on
- WebSelf-hosted
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- MIT licensed; self-host on your own infrastructure
- All features on every plan, including SSO and RBAC
- Apollo Federation v1 and v2; migration path from GraphOS
- Free plan covers 1M operations and unlimited seats
Trade-offs
- Usage data retention is 7 days on Hobby and 90 days on Pro
- Beyond 1M operations, Pro charges $10 per extra million
- SLA, dedicated Slack and onboarding only on Enterprise
Pricing
Published plans from Hive’s own pricing page, in USD. Usage charges and add-ons may apply on top.
| Plan | Monthly | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Hobby | —free forever |
|
| Pro | $20flat rate, unlimited seats |
|
| Enterprise | Contact sales |
|
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
- MCP support
- 0 out of 100
- API quality
- 30 out of 100
- Documentation
- 90 out of 100
- Agent friendliness
- 85 out of 100
- Pricing transparency
- 100 out of 100
- Changelog
- 0 out of 100
- Marketing site structure
- 50 out of 100
- Operational trust
- 25 out of 100
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
- Openness
- 25 out of 100
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Hive’s score
Alternatives in API Development
Ranked 1
86 — BenchRank score out of 100Postman
Postman · API platform for designing, testing, monitoring and distributing APIs
Best for: Development teams building, testing and managing APIs who want one tool from spec to monitoring.
Ranked 2
84.8 — BenchRank score out of 100Scalar
Scalar · API docs, SDKs, MCP servers and an API client from one OpenAPI file
Best for: API teams that want docs, SDKs and MCP servers generated from one OpenAPI document
Ranked 3
72.5 — BenchRank score out of 100Fern
Fern · Docs, SDKs and a CLI generated from your API spec
Best for: Teams with an OpenAPI-style spec who want hosted docs, generated SDKs and a CLI from one source


