
Grist
by Grist · Relational spreadsheet-database with Python formulas and row-level access rules
49.5 — BenchRank score out of 100
Screenshots of Grist
Homepage Pricing page
Overview
Grist is a relational spreadsheet-database for building data applications without code. Documents combine spreadsheet-style grids with linked tables, drag-and-drop layouts, charts, summary tables and forms, and formulas written in Python or familiar Excel functions. Granular access rules control who sees each row and column, and it can be self-hosted or reached through a REST API and webhooks.
- Best for
- Teams turning spreadsheets into relational apps that need row-level access rules or self-hosting
- Pricing
- Free plan, then Pro at $8/user/month and Business at $24/user/month (minimum 5 users), with Enterprise on request; annual billing saves 20% and nonprofits get 50% off Pro.
- Runs on
- WebSelf-hosted
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- Formulas support Python syntax plus Excel functions
- Access rules control visibility down to row and column
- Can be self-hosted; documents stored in SQLite format
- REST API, webhooks and custom widgets for extension
Trade-offs
- Records per document capped: 5,000 free, 150,000 on Business
- Business plan requires a minimum of 5 users
- Automations and priority email support start at $24/user/month
- SSO, audit log streaming and admin controls are Enterprise-only
Pricing
Published plans from Grist’s own pricing page, in USD. Usage charges and add-ons may apply on top.
| Plan | Monthly | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Free | —per user |
|
| Pro | $8per user |
|
| Business | $24per user |
|
| Enterprise | Contact sales |
|
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
- MCP support
- 0 out of 100
- API quality
- 30 out of 100
- Documentation
- 60 out of 100
- Agent friendliness
- 67 out of 100
- Pricing transparency
- 100 out of 100
- Changelog
- 100 out of 100
- Marketing site structure
- 45 out of 100
- Operational trust
- 25 out of 100
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
- Openness
- 85 out of 100
- Maintenance
- 100 out of 100
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Grist’s score
Alternatives in Frameworks & Libraries
Ranked 1
81.6 — BenchRank score out of 100Encore
Encore · Declare backend infrastructure in Go or TypeScript, deploy to your own cloud
Best for: Teams building Go or TypeScript backends on their own AWS or GCP without a platform team
Ranked 2
78.9 — BenchRank score out of 100Builder.io
Builder · Collaborative platform for building software with AI agents
Best for: Product teams wanting designers, PMs and marketers to edit the real codebase alongside engineers
Ranked 3
78.6 — BenchRank score out of 100Convex
Convex · Reactive TypeScript backend with database, functions, sync and search
Best for: Teams building TypeScript apps that want database, functions, sync and file storage in one backend


