
GitKraken
by GitKraken · Visual Git client, IDE extension and CLI with agent session tracking
60.5 — BenchRank score out of 100
Screenshots of GitKraken
Homepage Pricing page
Overview
GitKraken is a set of Git tools: a desktop client with a visual view of branches, commits and conflicts, GitLens for IDEs, a Git-enhanced CLI, and Git Integration for Jira. Paid plans add private repo access, AI features such as commit messages and merge conflict resolution, and an Agent Sessions view for Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, Gemini and OpenCode.
- Best for
- Developers and small teams wanting a visual Git client with private repo access and agent oversight
- Pricing
- Free Community tier, then Pro at £8 per seat per month and Advanced at £12 per seat per month, both billed annually and excluding tax, with enterprise terms on request.
- Runs on
- WebmacOSWindowsBrowser extensionSelf-hostedCLI
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- Free tier covers local repos and public remotes on Windows, Mac, Linux
- Desktop, GitLens for IDEs, CLI and Jira integration in one platform
- Weekly AI credit allowance included from the Pro tier upwards
- Advanced adds self-hosted GitHub, GitLab and Bitbucket integrations
Trade-offs
- Free tier has no private remotes; most features are public-repo only
- Prices are quoted per seat billed annually; no monthly rate is published
- Pro caps at 2 seats and Advanced at 10, forcing an upgrade as teams grow
- Insights is listed as Request Access rather than included on paid plans
Pricing
Published plans from GitKraken’s own pricing page, in GBP. Usage charges and add-ons may apply on top.
| Plan | Monthly | Annual (per month) | Includes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Community | —per seat | — |
|
| Pro | —per seat | £8 |
|
| Advanced | —per seat | £12 |
|
| Business | —per seat | — |
|
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
- MCP support
- 85 out of 100
- Documentation
- 0 out of 100
- Agent friendliness
- 67 out of 100
- Pricing transparency
- 100 out of 100
- Customer sentiment
- 79 out of 100
- Changelog
- 40 out of 100
- Marketing site structure
- 50 out of 100
- Operational trust
- 55 out of 100
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
- Openness
- 60 out of 100
- Maintenance
- 100 out of 100
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with GitKraken’s score
Alternatives in Code Assistants
Ranked 1
76.8 — BenchRank score out of 100Warp
Warp · Terminal for running and orchestrating coding agents
Best for: Developers running coding agents like Claude Code or Codex who want them managed in one terminal.
Ranked 2
76 — BenchRank score out of 100Superset
Superset · Desktop app for running coding agents in parallel Git worktrees
Best for: Developers on macOS running several CLI coding agents in parallel across isolated Git worktrees
Ranked 3
71.9 — BenchRank score out of 100Frontman
Frontman · AI website editor for existing WordPress, Next.js, Astro and Vite sites
Best for: Designers, PMs and marketing teams editing existing sites without waiting on developer tickets.


