
Firecamp
by Firecamp · Open-source multi-protocol API client with shared team workspaces
39.5 — BenchRank score out of 100
Screenshots of Firecamp
Homepage Pricing page
Overview
Firecamp is an open-source API platform for testing and developing REST, GraphQL, WebSocket and SocketIO APIs, each with a dedicated playground. Teams keep API collections in a shared workspace, publish documentation, use variables across the platform, and run collections in the visual test runner, the terminal or a CI/CD pipeline. Web and desktop apps are both available.
- Best for
- Dev teams testing REST, GraphQL, WebSocket and SocketIO APIs who want an open-source Postman alternative
- Pricing
- Free for up to 5 seats, then $59/month for up to 15 seats ($49/month billed yearly), with contact-sales Enterprise plans.
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- Playgrounds for REST, GraphQL, WebSocket and SocketIO in one app
- Open source, with both web and desktop apps
- Free plan: 5 seats, unlimited workspaces and collections
- In-app test runner plus CLI runs for CI/CD pipelines
Trade-offs
- Team plan stops at 15 seats; beyond that it is contact-sales only
- No published Enterprise pricing
- Community support only on the free plan
- Site content and footer date from 2023, so currency is unclear
Pricing
Published plans from Firecamp’s own pricing page, in USD. Usage charges and add-ons may apply on top.
| Plan | Monthly | Annual (per month) | Includes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | —up to 5 seats | — |
|
| Team | $59per month, up to 15 seats | $49 |
|
| Enterprise | Contact sales | — |
|
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
- MCP support
- 0 out of 100
- API quality
- 10 out of 100
- Documentation
- 55 out of 100
- Agent friendliness
- 60 out of 100
- Pricing transparency
- 100 out of 100
- Changelog
- 25 out of 100
- Marketing site structure
- 85 out of 100
- Operational trust
- 0 out of 100
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
- Openness
- 40 out of 100
- Maintenance
- 70 out of 100
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Firecamp’s score
Alternatives in API Development
Ranked 1
86 — BenchRank score out of 100Postman
Postman · API platform for designing, testing, monitoring and distributing APIs
Best for: Development teams building, testing and managing APIs who want one tool from spec to monitoring.
Ranked 2
84.8 — BenchRank score out of 100Scalar
Scalar · API docs, SDKs, MCP servers and an API client from one OpenAPI file
Best for: API teams that want docs, SDKs and MCP servers generated from one OpenAPI document
Ranked 3
72.5 — BenchRank score out of 100Fern
Fern · Docs, SDKs and a CLI generated from your API spec
Best for: Teams with an OpenAPI-style spec who want hosted docs, generated SDKs and a CLI from one source


