Fing
by Fing · Network scanner and device monitoring for home and business networks
BenchRank score
Screenshots of Fing
Homepage
Overview
Fing scans local networks to identify every connected device, drawing on a catalogue of 450,000 device models. It runs as a desktop app, a mobile app, a browser view and an agent on Raspberry Pi, NAS or Docker, all syncing through one account. Paid plans add continuous monitoring, a full event timeline, alerts, router vulnerability checks and device blocking.
- Best for
- Home users and small IT teams who need to inventory, monitor and control devices on a network.
- Pricing
- Free plan at $0, then Premium at $69.99/year and Professional at $149.99/year, with checkout prices varying by region.
- Runs on
- WebiOSAndroidmacOSWindowsLinux
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- Recognises devices against a catalogue of 450,000 device models
- Desktop, mobile, web and Raspberry Pi/Docker agent share one account
- Paid plans auto-block unknown devices and schedule Internet downtime
- SOC 2 Type II certified
Trade-offs
- Continuous monitoring needs Fing Desktop or an always-on Fing Agent
- Free plan caps manual scans at 3 per day, with no automated scans
- Premium covers 2 monitored networks, Professional 3
- Workspaces and multi-user collaboration are Professional-only
Pricing
Published plans and prices from Fing’s own pricing page.
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
MCP support
Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.
Documentation
Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.
Agent friendliness
How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.
Pricing transparency
Whether real prices are published, self-serve signup exists, and usage costs are knowable without a sales call.
Changelog
A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.
Marketing site structure
Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.
Page speed
How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.
Operational trust
Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
Openness
Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Fing’s score
Where this comes from
The Fing pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.
Alternatives in Monitoring & Observability
Ranked 1
87.4 — BenchRank score out of 100openstatus
OpenStatus · Open source status pages with uptime monitoring from 28 regions
Best for: Teams that need a public status page and uptime checks while working towards SOC 2.
Ranked 2
86.7 — BenchRank score out of 100OneUptime
OneUptime · Open-source observability and incident management on one platform
Best for: Teams wanting monitoring, on-call, status pages and observability on one open-source platform
Ranked 3
83.1 — BenchRank score out of 100Sentry
Sentry · Error tracking and application performance monitoring for developers
Best for: Development teams wanting error monitoring, tracing and session replay tied to one trace
Is this your product?
Claim Fing to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.