EasyMonitor
by EasyMonitor · Self-hosted uptime monitoring with multi-region probe quorum
BenchRank score
Screenshots of EasyMonitor
Homepage
Overview
EasyMonitor is an open-source, self-hosted uptime monitor. A Laravel app schedules HTTP and ICMP checks onto Redis Streams, Go probe binaries in any region claim them and publish results, and a consumer writes to TimescaleDB and triggers alerts. Cross-probe quorum decides up or down, and the app serves public, unlisted or private status pages.
- Best for
- Small teams that want to run their own uptime monitoring and status pages on their own servers.
- Pricing
- No prices are shown: the software is MIT licensed and self-hosted, and the site states there is no per-monitor or per-seat charge.
- Runs on
- Self-hosted
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- Unlimited monitors, no per-monitor or per-seat pricing
- Cross-probe quorum from probes on hosts you own
- Status pages with custom domains and auto-HTTPS via Caddy
- MIT licensed, installed with one setup script
Trade-offs
- Self-hosted only — no hosted option is shown
- Checks are limited to HTTP and ICMP
- Remote probes need your own tunnel (Tailscale, Cloudflare or VPN)
- Pre-1.0 at v0.2.1, and needs a server with ~2 GB RAM
How EasyMonitor markets itself
A structured read of the promise, proof and page design on EasyMonitor’s captured homepage.
Homepage capture
“Multi-region uptime monitoring you can self-host”
- Angle: Open source / ownership
- Hero: Terminal / CLI
Pricing
Published plans and prices from EasyMonitor’s own pricing page.
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
MCP support
Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.
Documentation
Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.
Agent friendliness
How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.
Changelog
A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.
Marketing site structure
Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.
Page speed
How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.
Operational trust
Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
Openness
Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.
Maintenance
Release cadence and repository activity. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — it is only measurable for open repositories.
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with EasyMonitor’s score
Where this comes from
The EasyMonitor pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.
Alternatives in Monitoring & Observability
Ranked 1
87.4 — BenchRank score out of 100openstatus
OpenStatus · Open source status pages with uptime monitoring from 28 regions
Best for: Teams that need a public status page and uptime checks while working towards SOC 2.
Ranked 2
86.7 — BenchRank score out of 100OneUptime
OneUptime · Open-source observability and incident management on one platform
Best for: Teams wanting monitoring, on-call, status pages and observability on one open-source platform
Ranked 3
83.1 — BenchRank score out of 100Sentry
Sentry · Error tracking and application performance monitoring for developers
Best for: Development teams wanting error monitoring, tracing and session replay tied to one trace
Is this your product?
Claim EasyMonitor to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.