Docs
by Docs · Open-source collaborative document editor you can self-host
BenchRank score
Screenshots of Docs
Homepage
Overview
Docs is an open-source, web-based text editor for teams, with block-based editing, slash commands, tables, columns and media. Documents nest into sub-docs to build a knowledge base, and several people can edit the same document at once with live cursors, presence and comments. It is MIT licensed and runs on your own infrastructure or on a public community instance.
- Best for
- Teams wanting a self-hosted, real-time collaborative document editor with full control of their content.
- Pricing
- No prices are shown; Docs is free, MIT-licensed software you self-host, with public instances run by the community.
- Runs on
- Self-hosted
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- Real-time editing with live cursors, presence and comments
- MIT licensed; self-host on Docker Compose, Kubernetes, Nix or YunoHost
- Imports .docx and .md; exports .docx, .odt and .pdf
- Version history on every save, with rollback to any earlier state
Trade-offs
- Documents are not end-to-end encrypted; unsuited for restricted content
- Content search, notifications and find-and-replace are still on the roadmap
- Self-hosting requires Docker Compose and GNU Make, or Kubernetes
- AI is optional and needs your own LLM provider wired up when self-hosting
How Docs markets itself
A structured read of the promise, proof and page design on Docs’s captured homepage.
Homepage capture
“The document editor that turns your team's content into knowledge.”
- Angle: Outcome / benefit-led
- Hero: Product screenshot
Pricing
Published plans and prices from Docs’s own pricing page.
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
MCP support
Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.
API quality
Public API surface: machine-readable spec, official SDKs, documented auth, errors, rate limits and versioning.
Documentation
Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.
Agent friendliness
How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.
Changelog
A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.
Marketing site structure
Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.
Page speed
How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.
Operational trust
Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
Openness
Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.
Maintenance
Release cadence and repository activity. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — it is only measurable for open repositories.
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Docs’s score
Where this comes from
The Docs pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.
Alternatives in Collaboration & Communication
Ranked 1
88.5 — BenchRank score out of 100Novu
Novu · Open-source notification infrastructure for multi-channel product messaging
Best for: Development teams adding multi-channel product notifications to a web or mobile app.
Ranked 2
80.8 — BenchRank score out of 100Plane
Plane · Project management, wiki and AI agents in one workspace
Best for: Teams leaving Jira or Linear that want projects, docs and AI agents in one self-hostable tool
Ranked 3
78.4 — BenchRank score out of 100Slack
Slack · Channel-based team messaging with built-in AI and workflow automation
Best for: Teams wanting channel-based messaging, huddles and AI summaries in one place, plus external chat.
Is this your product?
Claim Docs to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.