dDocs
by dDocs · Open-source, end-to-end encrypted document editor
BenchRank score
Screenshots of dDocs
Homepage
Overview
dDocs is an open-source document editor from Fileverse that encrypts documents locally before they leave the author's or collaborator's device, including while commenting and suggesting edits. It supports Markdown, LaTeX and Mermaid, works offline and across devices, and organises work with tabs and folders. Documents stay recoverable even if dDocs.new goes down.
- Best for
- Writers and teams who want an encrypted, AI-free editor for drafting and collaborative review
- Pricing
- No prices are shown on the captured page; log in / sign up is offered but no plans or figures are published.
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- End-to-end encrypted locally, including during collaboration
- Supports Markdown, LaTeX and Mermaid in the editor
- Offline mode, cross-device, tabs, folders and custom themes
- Open source; docs recoverable even if dDocs.new goes down
Trade-offs
- Deliberately AI-free, so no AI drafting or summarising
- No pricing, storage or team-admin detail on the captured page
- Identity sign-up shown only as a name or an ENS domain
Pricing
Published plans and prices from dDocs’s own pricing page.
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
MCP support
Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.
Documentation
Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.
Agent friendliness
How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.
Changelog
A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.
Marketing site structure
Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.
Page speed
How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.
Operational trust
Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
Openness
Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.
Maintenance
Release cadence and repository activity. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — it is only measurable for open repositories.
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with dDocs’s score
Where this comes from
The dDocs pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.
Alternatives in Collaboration & Communication
Ranked 1
88.5 — BenchRank score out of 100Novu
Novu · Open-source notification infrastructure for multi-channel product messaging
Best for: Development teams adding multi-channel product notifications to a web or mobile app.
Ranked 2
80.8 — BenchRank score out of 100Plane
Plane · Project management, wiki and AI agents in one workspace
Best for: Teams leaving Jira or Linear that want projects, docs and AI agents in one self-hostable tool
Ranked 3
78.4 — BenchRank score out of 100Slack
Slack · Channel-based team messaging with built-in AI and workflow automation
Best for: Teams wanting channel-based messaging, huddles and AI summaries in one place, plus external chat.
Is this your product?
Claim dDocs to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.