Coroot
by Coroot · eBPF-based self-hosted observability for metrics, logs, traces and profiles
BenchRank score
Screenshots of Coroot
Homepage
Overview
Coroot is a self-hosted observability platform that uses eBPF to gather metrics, logs, traces and profiles without code changes. It covers applications, databases, infrastructure, cloud and network in one view, and handles storage, visualisation, alerting and SLO tracking. AI-assisted root cause analysis traces dependencies and suggests fixes.
- Best for
- SRE and DevOps teams wanting self-hosted, per-core-priced observability without instrumenting code
- Pricing
- A free open-source Community Edition on GitHub, then Standard at $1 per monitored CPU core/month with volume discounts, and Premium on contact-sales pricing; a 14-day trial is offered with no credit card.
- Runs on
- Self-hosted
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- eBPF-based collection, so no code changes or instrumentation
- Priced per monitored CPU core rather than by data volume
- Self-hosted, so telemetry stays in your own infrastructure
- Metrics, logs, traces and profiles in a single platform
Trade-offs
- Self-hosted only; the pages show no managed or hosted option
- Standard support is business hours only; 24×7 and phone need Premium
- Premium pricing is not published — you must contact sales
- Cost tracks CPU core count, so idle cores still cost the same
How Coroot markets itself
A structured read of the promise, proof and page design on Coroot’s captured homepage.
Homepage capture
“Full-stack observability in minutes”
- Angle: Speed / time-to-value
- Hero: Product video demo
Pricing
Published plans and prices from Coroot’s own pricing page.
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
MCP support
Whether an agent can drive the product through the Model Context Protocol, and how much setup that takes.
API quality
Public API surface: machine-readable spec, official SDKs, documented auth, errors, rate limits and versioning.
Documentation
Publicly reachable docs — coverage, freshness, code samples and machine readability.
Agent friendliness
How readable the site is to an automated client: llms.txt, structured data, server-rendered content, crawler access.
Pricing transparency
Whether real prices are published, self-serve signup exists, and usage costs are knowable without a sales call.
Changelog
A public, dated record of what shipped and when — the clearest signal that a product is still alive.
Marketing site structure
Whether the site answers a buyer's questions: clear positioning, the pages that matter, and accessibility.
Page speed
How fast the site loads for real visitors: Chrome UX Report 75th-percentile LCP, INP and CLS, with a Lighthouse mobile run standing in where a site has too little traffic for field data.
Operational trust
Status page and incident history, security disclosure, compliance and data-processing documentation.
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
Openness
Source availability, self-hosting, data export and open standards. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — paid SaaS is not worse for being paid SaaS.
Maintenance
Release cadence and repository activity. Scored and shown, but not part of the composite — it is only measurable for open repositories.
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Coroot’s score
Where this comes from
The Coroot pages BenchRank reads when it scores the product — its documentation, release notes, status and security pages, and its repository where there is one.
Alternatives in Monitoring & Observability
Ranked 1
87.4 — BenchRank score out of 100openstatus
OpenStatus · Open source status pages with uptime monitoring from 28 regions
Best for: Teams that need a public status page and uptime checks while working towards SOC 2.
Ranked 2
86.7 — BenchRank score out of 100OneUptime
OneUptime · Open-source observability and incident management on one platform
Best for: Teams wanting monitoring, on-call, status pages and observability on one open-source platform
Ranked 3
83.1 — BenchRank score out of 100Sentry
Sentry · Error tracking and application performance monitoring for developers
Best for: Development teams wanting error monitoring, tracing and session replay tied to one trace
Is this your product?
Claim Coroot to manage its profile. Claiming lets you suggest edits to the descriptive fields — it never changes scores or rankings.